Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:GITMO still open? (Score 1) 426

You're presuming that these people are al qaeda members. This type of presupposition of guilt is not part of any criminal justice system.

In World War 2, it was pretty easy to identify members of the enemy forces because the sides were more clearly defined. "War on terror" is very murky and it's not so easy to tell who's an enemy combatant, right? This is why you'd need evidence before detaining people indefinitely. There was also an end to World War 2, but there will not be an end to a war on the concept of terrorism. A few days ago, Obama said in some impromptu remarks that Bradley Manning had broken the law. This has not been established by the organ that properly establishes guilt. But if the commander in chief says someone is guilty, that doesn't taint the process? Was the president getting involved in military commissions back in the day by calling verdicts in advance to the press?

Maybe it was just bad phrasing, but the underlying concept remains. All these actions (in Manning's case, just for example) are taken under the presumption of guilt.

Comment Re:GITMO still open? (Score 4, Insightful) 426

As unattractive as those options are, only one of them is legal. Part of having a constitutional government with elected leaders is that the law supersedes anyone's desires to the contrary. If the founders had wanted the president to have the powers of royalty they would have written them in. Or left room for them. This is explicitly not the case. What else can we call detaining people in an extralegal prison based purely on the say-so of the President or forces under his command? This is one branch of government playing the role of two branches, and violates the checks and balances fundamental to the system. As another poster points out, the military base at Guantanamo Bay is not part of the criminal justice system.

Comment Re:Get offline and do experiments (Score 1) 225

Well I wasn't talking about watching a CGI simulation of whatever, but an actual film of something. That is, use video and tools to analyze something that you built. This makes it easier to start analyzing found video that you didn't take yourself. When video was made available of the big oil spill last year, we spent a little time in the Calc classes trying to think of ways to model it. That didn't pan out but I don't think it was wasted time.

And I'm exactly like this girl you apparently know who believes that raising animals with the purpose of killing them is cruel.

Comment precision (Score 1) 257

This sounds like it could save civilian lives in urban settings. Precision and knowing where to direct fire means fewer stray bullets or unintended people caught in areas of effect. I don't know anything about combat though so if this is way off I welcome correction.

Comment Re:Wow (Score 1) 832

Bill's charitable work is actually quite awesome. Among other things, his foundation is very good at making sure that their funding goes to projects that actually work (surprisingly unusual in the non-profit world).

Now, I don't approve of how he made his money, but I do approve of him using his money to help people rather than just hang out and be rich with Warren Buffett all day.

Mr. Gates has great intentions, and he should therefore beware of creating monocultures in his various avenues of venture philanthropy. The public health work is admirable, and the foundation's efforts in education are less so. Full disclosure: I'm a teacher union guy. But, my objection to the Gates-Broad-Walton education agenda is that there's no basis for it other than groupthink. That is, it fails your standard of money going to things that actually work. Without getting too far off topic, let me link this article from Dissent magazine:

On February 16, 2008, the New York Times reported on a memo that it had obtained, written by Dr. Arata Kochi, head of the World Health Organization’s malaria programs, to WHO’s director general. Because the Gates Foundation was funding almost everyone studying malaria, Dr. Arata complained, the cornerstone of scientific research—independent review—was falling apart.

There's more right after that that's also interesting. I admit that it's probably difficult for one person with a lot of money to encourage diversity of thinking when everyone is beholden to them for their research money. Or maybe it's just hard for me to think of ways.

Comment Teacher Unions (Score 1) 947

I encourage everyone to find out which side of this issue their local teacher union is on. It's very likely the science side, and this is an example of why tenure has an important function of protecting academic freedom. People pooh-pooh the role of academic freedom in k-12 schools, but it does matter.

We used the issue in one of our interview questions when deciding whom to endorse for the local school board elections. And I live in a pretty conservative area.

Comment Shogo: Mobile Armored Division (Score 1) 518

Shogo: MAD is from 1998, so it qualifies. There's not enough giant robot in modern games, in my opinion.

I also enjoyed the sarcastic sense of humor in this Monolith game. Other Monolith games include No One Lives Forever, which is fine on its own, and the sequel and spinoff to that game.

Republic Commando is from 2005, so that's still quite recent but I would love to see more star wars games in that vein.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker

Working...