I find it interesting that for this audience the media list doesn't include books.

Something that makes this new paper fit in with all previous "scientific" papers I've seen on cold fusion:
- No error analysis. Just straight numbers and tidy graphs with no error bars. The couple of uncertainty ranges added to make it look better were pulled out of their hat.
- Pictures of the experimental apparatus, but no diagrams of what's actually claimed to be going on.
Also noteworthy:
- Most of the authors have never been seen before on arxiv.
- The one who has posted a lot to arxiv (Essen) has mostly produced articles relating to fractured ceramic vessels.

It looks like quantum teleportation meets delayed choice.

It would be nice if they'd also do something about the remote sensing infrastructure to get more data to these nice new supercomputers. My current understanding is that the Feds are getting increasingly weak in that department.

This will definitely give the bio-ethicists something to chew on.

A friend of my in the 70's who was a math grad student at the time was playing with taking the absolute value of gamma = 1 / sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) to avoid the imaginary aspect of the term. Only at light speed was a massive particle forbidden. The square of the momentum remains real. Other results were the same: Things become less energetic the farther you get from light speed in either direction. At sqrt(2) times c, your relativistic mass and time are the same as at rest and your subjective trip time matches that of distant observers. Finally, at infinite speed you have zero mass and your subjective trip time is the same as the distance traveled (times c, of course). I seriously doubt my friend was the first person to come up with this. What's different with the new publication, AFAICT, is that these guys have an eager university press office. I love it when the press release folks feel obliged to mention that the work appears in a "prestigious" journal.

I've seen many Slashdot posts that are copy/pastes of press releases, so what's new. I follow eurekalert.org, and have been really appalled at times at the low quality of the reporting.

I'm curious what's going on such that the top is heavier than the Higgs rather than the other way around. All I've been able to find is people asking why the top was found first. *That* I understand--the Higgs signal is much much smaller. I remember something from long ago about the top's mass "leaking," if you will, to the the lighter particles, but that doesn't mesh with how I understand the Higgs mechanism. Anyway, I would expect the Higgs particle manifestation to be the most massive of those that participate in the Higgs field.

Not so strange. Space.com is one of many more or less hermetically sealed news sites.

'nuff said.

It will be cool if the experimental permit works.

I can't decide if the question is about what punishment he should get as opposed to what punishment he's likely to receive. Legally I think they could go for the death penalty. I hope they don't.

Slashdotting + Ad click revenue => $$$

The actual "FA" is here, with images. Gigan, et al. say, "opaque materials."