Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment True for JAVA, but not generally true... (Score 4, Interesting) 270

This may be true for Java.
It isn't true for C/C++.

With C/C++ and NPTL, the many-thread blocking IO style yields slightly lower latency at low IO rates, but offers significant latency variability and sharply decreased thruput at higher IO rates.
It seems that the linux scheduler is much to blame for this-- the number of times that a thread is scheduled on a different CPU increases dramatically with more threads, and this trashes the caches.
I've seen order-of-magnitude decreases in performance and order-of-magnitude increases in latency as a result of what appears to be the cache trashing.

Comment Re:Duh (Score 1) 269

Note that this isn't always true.
There are extensions (implemented my many browsers) in TLS which allow it to tell the server which host the connection is intended to be for in the handshake.
I don't believe that IE implements this, but it could only be IE6. I forget.

This is important, since we're running out of IPs and people do want to use virtual hosting in the same manner that they do for HTTP-- symmetry is easy to maintain!

Comment Re:Correction:If avg page is 320 KB, headers use 3 (Score 1) 230

They are attempting to add it to Chromium and get it into HTTP servers.

http://dev.chromium.org/spdy

There is a link to the code somewhere there. If not, just search the chromium repo as that is where it lives.

It is open and you can play with it too. There is also an Apache mod for it, I believe, though I haven't searched for that lately.
More numbers and studies are available there.

disclosure: I'm one of the SPDY authors

Comment Re:Seems reasonable (Score 1) 949

If it is logical to kill anyone who speaks against you because you can get away with it (and the outcome is more beneficial to you, you believe), then it is reasonable to kill people for speaking out against you?

logic != ethical.

All of the logical arguments that show that our ethics have evolved don't apply in this case. When we create systems where one entity has nearly absolute power we've thrown our millions of years of evolution out the window and face extinction. This would be one logical outcome-- nature will evolve to adapt to that people's future non-existence...

Anyway... your point is absurd :)

Comment Re:Hooray! (Score 1) 457

The road to hell is also paved with standing by and doing nothing when they take your freedom away from you. If the companies have say over what does and doesn't go over their network, what do you think they're gonna do? They'll happily let customers gab about how they such? Ha, right. How about letting their customers offer a competing service? Ha. What about letting anyone else offer a competing service? Uh no.

Look, sometimes government is there for a good reason. It is *HARD* to go and get rights to lay cable, not even counting the expense of doing it. Look at the companies that have been suing local gov'ts when they've been laying their own cable (and *WINNING* the argument, if not the case, by out-spending the local gov'ts).

Pull your head out of the sand and look around.

Comment Re:This is important! (Score 1) 271

No, unfortunately, I actually know what I'm talking about while you're being irrational and insulting.
The analogy was an attempt to get you to understand the loadbalancing problem, which I'd really like for you to understand.

Slashdot Top Deals

A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always valuable. -- Thomas Jefferson

Working...