Nonsense. The founding Fathers were avid trekkie fans. Subspace Communicators (frequency shifting cell phones) they understood. Andeif we had developed phasers instead of AK-47s, they would have had a handle on that too.
Two birds, one stone, ten mice, one cat, one bell.
Not fired. Quarantined. as is the case with the whole city. They need to take a one-month break, with robotic Amazon food and TP delivery on call.
Of those 80 people, how many do you think work at the lochal grocery store, or a fast food restaurant? How many would be permitted to take time off for minor cold symptoms? How many could afford to do so?
okay, first: they HAVEN'T identified the length or method of transmissability, because it keeps spreading by surprise.
second: we know that in Africa they have missed many cases. Therefore, 7000 actual cases would not be far off.
Third, the world population is 7 million, so there are 2^20 doublings (at 23 days each) between now and total infection, at the current rate.
Fourth, the US population, including illegals, is about 350 million. So by the math, you might guess that there was 350 cases in the US, but the actual rate of spread is probably initially faster than a 23-day doubling, but slower to enter the country. So a reasonable guestimate is that we might have 120 cases, about a third of 350, but with Dallas/CDC response, we'll rapidly catch that 350 number.
In line with that, I'd estimate that in any state that has a lot of human commerce with Dallas (including Louisiana, Virginia, Oklahoma, and California), you could estimate the number of cases by dividing the state population by 3 million, more or less.
In other words, we're in deep trouble already.
nobody bothered to tell you? There's an app for that, you know.
Third time's the charm: trying to come up with something you can just click-and-read:
This one's in html:
whoops, forgot there's stuff on arxiv: just read this one:
sorry, I forgot about this arxiv article:
No, the science isn't settled.
http://www.worldcat.org/title/...
But the metric being wrong means that black holes fail to satisfy conservation of energy. Assume that conservation of energy is satisfied and fix the metric -- you'll find that a cross term was dropped -- and it all works out.
there are errors in the standard equations, such that the lagrangian breaks down there, because the standard equations do not properly account for energy conservation.
http://www.worldcat.org/title/...
Fix your metric, and it comes out correctly. And black holes then do mathe|atically exist.
The callousness here is more than I can deal with, so I will deal with trivia. Look up the death of Arias, IIRC, or the plague of Athens. Ebola, like AIDS, existed long ago (AIDS cite: The Tipping Point, note about research showing AIDS-type deaths in Napoleonic era)
Well, the mathematically sound system would be to pay real wages for real work, so that you couldn't hire shills at a dime-a-dozen. Not only because they had real pay, but also because they had more self respect than that. But that runs contrary to the American ideal (which is More for the Powerful, and the Powerless can dream of that which will never, trust me, never be). Which means that in an Amerika-run world (or EU... trust me, EU is the same only worse), it won't happen.
The same is true with google. Well, I never use it any more, because if I google something, I either get Alibaba or yelp, and unless I want Alibaba or yelp, it doesn't help me one iota. After all, if I wanted Alibaba, I'd GO to alibaba.
windmill power goes something like the 4th power of the blade speed. As a result, your maximumepower is harvested at the windmill blade tips. To increase the efficiency, you want maximum possible tip speed, but wear is a function of shaft speed. so you want high tip speed, low shaft speed. Therefore you need a large area.
Or lets put it in terms of the disk plane. Harvestable wind is a function of the area of the intersected disk. If you double the radius, you quadruple the harvestable wind. Actually, you do better than that because you reach higher (with a higher wind speed), and farther from the tower (which slows the wind). So again, you want a large radius blade.And yes, long blades under extreme torsional and bending moments, at high speed IS a recipe for blade failure.
On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN.
