First, that is not quite what I wrote. I think you missed the point. Second, that has little to do with the Department of Education. Tell me: when have you seen a proposal to remove "gun free zones" around schools? When EVERY school shooting that has taken place in recent years, took place in a "gun free zone"? That is an in-your-face illustration of how such restrictive laws hurt only the law-abiding citizens. Someone who is planning to shoot someone else (in other words, a criminal) doesn't give a damn about the gun free zones. So what do they accomplish? So far, absolutely nothing.
My remark was specifically about the hypocrisy of the Department of Education, endorsing things like "gun-free zones" while at the same time, it has a definite specification for, and appears to be stockpiling, assault-style shotguns. (Apologies for the use of "assault" in that sentence, as I am aware that technically it is a meaningless distinction. But it does give someone a very rough idea of what kind of firearms they were buying.)
I have very little tolerance for hypocrites. Especially hypocrites of this caliber.
This sums up my view of "gun-free" areas or other restrictions on firearms:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1u0Byq5Qis