Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment It's a start. (Score 2) 100

As much as this is just an obvious attempt to support Putin's propaganda and narrative, it's also an opportunity to impart a dash of fear unto the Meta bigwigs who probably deserve it.

Profiting from and leading a company which knowingly employs psychology as a tool (weapon?) to keep children engaged (despite some seriously harmful side effects) may not make you a terrorist, but it does make you someone who is willing to hurt children for profit.

Comment Arguably the most beneficial social network ever. (Score 2) 23

TLDR: Yowza has paid its users about $4 apiece, on average.

Based on my napkin-math and Yowza's advertised metrics, Yowza currently has about 8000 users who have referred at least 1 person.
The top 50 referrers have referred between 12 and 500 each (about 2500 total).
So assume maybe 20k-40k registered users.

They've already given away $69,420 to the top referrer, another $6,000 to the top scorers of each of seven challenges, $5,000 to the top scorer of another challenge, and $4.20 to 10,000 users who refer at least one user. So about $159,000 paid out to under 40k users. They paid us about $4 apiece to entertain us for a day and give us an interesting art installation/piece of commentary.

Comment Staggering? Really? (Score 1) 30

My problem with this headline is the word "staggering". It implies that someone should or might be surprised by this.

Companies, governments, and any other institution which can't literally be sent to prison must be assumed to be doing whatever they can to maximize their power and profit, up to a fairly significant level of illegality and abhorrence. To pretend otherwise is to be drinking the capitalist system's Kool-aid.

This isn't because humans are bad people (though many are), it's because this is the behavior the system is currently configured to motivate and tolerate. This even includes the judicial system's role in things by doling out lip service penalties and "justice" to maintain the appearance of having a functional system of checks and balances, so the proletariat doesn't get too riled up and maybe do something to change things from operating as intended.

Comment Check out his recent interviews. (Score 1) 347

On podcasts and YouTube, he's been making the book tour rounds lately. Hearing him discuss his conclusions with others is interesting, enlightening, and compelling. He also addresses the people (such as many who have responded here already) who misunderstand his rationale, conclusion, or implications.

For example, he does NOT advocate for removing consequences for criminal actions. Rather, he supports reframing prison as quarantine, with the significant differences that would entail. He also talks about how meritocracy doesn't make sense either.

Pick your podcast poison, if interested:

Armchair Expert w Dax Shepherd:
https://podcasts.google.com/fe...

The Psychology Podcast:
https://podcasts.google.com/fe...

Making Sense w Sam Harris:
https://podcasts.google.com/fe...

Jordan Peterson:
https://podcasts.google.com/fe...

Huberman Lab:
https://podcasts.google.com/fe...

Slashdot Top Deals

Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.

Working...