"unreasonable"

It's not that complicated. The whole question will revolve around whether it is reasonable to search a detainee's cell phone. The 5-4 decision with John Roberts writing for the majority will read something like "it is well within the limits of searches for officer safety to ensure there is not any communication emanating from the phone that may be used to summon help for the detainee from acquaintances, which would pose a clear and imminent threat to officer safety."

I know you don't want to bet against me...

"But there may be an app running on the smart phone to summon the detainee's friends to come help by attacking the police officer.

Therefore it is well within the limits of a search incident to arrest to examine every bit of data on a cell phone to ensure that is not happening."

This will basically be what the opinion says. I'd put money on it.

Injected into the veins, everclear will be every bit as lethal as these drug cocktails. And, the deceased gets one last buzz on their way out.

An organization that derives its funding from the sense of crisis in their reports finds that the situation is quite alarming.

It's funny, because at first I thought their email was a phishing attempt, because it did not come from target.com directly, and linked me to a website that had target logos and such but was also not a target.com domain. I had to make a phone call to find that it was legitimate.

I got the email notice from Target at TWO of my email accounts that my information had been stolen.

I pored over my financial data and found that I have not used any credit card at a Target store since 2008. So, obviously the breadth and depth of this attack are a lot more extensive than what they are telling us.

Either that or Target is simply blasting everyone in their email database whether or not they believe the customer's information was stolen, which says that Target still really has no idea whose information was taken and whose wasn't.

It really is a reflection of the vast incompetency of Target management. They don't know ANYTHING, and have just been firing the shotgun since this whole story broke.

Only end-to-end with other TS users, unfortunately.

CM11 incorporates TS and makes it transparent to the user, which is nice, so everyone using CM11 gets end-to-end with every other CM11 user.

Yeah. It's too bad that US Citizens don't enjoy that prohibition anymore:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-57364330-281/judge-americans-can-be-forced-to-decrypt-their-laptops/

Some ant species have been found to engineer underground agriculture systems where they create rooms and tunnels that foster the flow of moist air through them, so they can grow fungi to eat.

Wiki Ant-Fungus Mutualism. It's pretty fascinating.

I am absolutely stunned, shocked, and completely amazed that one branch of government would resist another branch exercising a check and balance against it.

So Dice can make money on the ad impressions that result from the inevitable firestorm of ridicule.

Some people just don't know tongue-in-cheek humor when they see it.

While we're at it, let's start holding screwdriver manufacturers responsible when burglars use them to break into houses...

You obviously know nothing about women.

My wife loves chocolate as well, but hates to eat it because she likes being skinny more than she likes eating chocolate (and if you ask any woman, the two are mutually exclusive). So, if I have chocolate in the house, I must compete with her and ensure that I eat most of it, otherwise she gets upset.