Comment Seems like the punishment is directed incorrectly (Score 1) 158
I'd say whoever made the light fixtures, and sold them for general use emitting that much interference is really the person against whom they should be acting.
The article says the lights are made by GE, who was aware that some of their ballasts were causing interference. IF the building owner was advised, and they failed to replace them, then they're at fault. If GE's replacement program was chintzy (ie they'd replace the fixture, but building owners had to pay for labor, for example), then they should be the target here.