I was sexually active at age 15, and masturbated much more than I do now.
Doesn't the resurrection explanation lack plausibility? Almost any explanation is more credible than the resurrection story. How do we know that anyone really saw a genuine post-crucifixion Jesus? Jesus could have had a twin or Doppelganger. What if zombie Jesus wasn't even human. It could have been a jesus-shaped cloud of robotic nano-ants that the martyrs saw. Maybe someone was influencing the martyrs testimony with a behavior modification device.
If Jesus had the ability to return from the grave then surely he would have the power to time travel. Time traveling powers are no more far-fetched than resurrection powers. All of the above explanations are slightly more credible than the resurrection story.
Just as copyright law restricts people's right to copy, performance rights restrict people's right to perform.
Fast, cheap, good: pick two.