So after trying to write thank you e-mails to birthday well wishers, I had gmail
shut me down. They thought I was a spammer. This made redesign evaluations a
bit of a trick. But I'm hopefully caught up.
Today's entries are largely repeats. Most (all?) of them have been posted
in my journal before. Some have been revised. Some have not. I'm not planning
on posting any more mockup links to jpgs. These are essentially "Finalists". The
contest still is not "Closed"- We plan to take entries at least through tomorrow.
Revisions to any design are welcome. If you have been exchanging emails with me,
try to reply to your old emails with updates to I can keep threads together. There
have been 200+ entries, and I can't keep all ya'll straight.
Michael Johnson's design
has gone through a few variations, but I keep coming back to this one. I think
this one needs work yet to win. I'd prefer green article titles. I want to see
what he will do with that upper right hand corner. I think his left hand
menu could use some fanciness. The slashbox fonts are to small for my tastes.
His 'Read More' space could stand out. Abbreviated text font size is really
small (and doesn't stick out well). But I think that with a few hours of work,
we could make this work.
Matt Walker's entry
is another sharp one. I think his logo metallic shading affect is to much-
it needs to be much more subtle. Also I can't tell if he wants his background
to be dark grey or dark green- there's floating green edge on the logo that
doesn't work. But his menu choices are solid. His slashboxes stick out
and have a lot of pop. His articles look nice.
Nate Ziarek's
design features a very attractive left hand menu, and interesting slashboxes.
The menu is HUGE here, and he doesn't use the upper right hand corner- but if
you move the preferences up there and make the left menu a little narrower, this
is an excellent entry.
Chuck
Han's entry is the only one to feature a blinking curser ;)
Ian MacLeod's design has a LOT
going for it, and one crippling bad thing: the main problem is his choice to
use a light green background. It just doesn't work for me. It just feels
soft. I'm not sure how I feel about the floating left column topic icons
either, but I share this entry because I think his 'Rea More' graphic is
great. The fading in on the left, and the curve on the right... it's a simple
cool design. The drop down menus look nice for his menus. Most/All of
the necessary navigational elements are here and well done. I'd like to
see this with a white background in the main space instead. But it's
very elegant. A great entry.
Alek Bendiken's
submission is another great one. His slashboxes look cool. His header
is spacious and efficient. Th gentle gradiant on the titlebars looks
great. I don't care for the line between is quoted text and unquoted text-
I think the line should go, and he should put a vertical line to the left
of the quote and/or more space. I think the article footer is a bit bland.
Unlike many entries, he paid attention to his footer. I might switch the
curves from left to right... I might not. It's subtle but wonderful. This
design doesn't have tags, system messages, or abbreviated articles, but it's
a really great entry.
Peter Lada's entry
is back once again. The issues I have with this design now are really minor.
I think he uses his triangular arrow things inconsistently: I think a triangle
really visiaully says 'click to expand' which works on the left hand menu-
except he uses down arrows on every menu item. He has right arrow on department
lines and abbreviated articles, but there's no expansion in there. I'd want
to work out some minor details, but this is a great design that really looks
like 'Slashdot'.
As I said before, the contest is not closed, but we are now beginning to
judge on compatibility, and implementation details. Eg, how much HTML did
each design change. How much 'Work' would it take us to deploy, and how well
does each design work on various browsers. I'd appreciate feedback on these
points especially from anyone willing to post comments here. We want our
winner to look good, be compatible, and accessible, as well as lightweight.
So keep 'em coming. This is the home stretch... I want to pick a winner
soon!