It could also mean that people are looking at "sharing" jobs as permanent.
It could also mean this research was sponsored by Uber.
Good for him -- understanding that there's a conflict of interest shows a great deal of self-awareness
Better than the alternative... staying on the board and saying his other ventures pose no risk at all.
He has realized how big a joke AI is in relation to the hype (which he largely helped to create) like many of us have, and he is just distancing himself from embarrassment and a bad investment like a coward instead of admitting he was wrong.
The only hype is that the "AI revolution" is coming in "5-10 years", when in reality it will probably be closer to 20 to 50 years, or possibly as long as 100 to 200 years. But regardless, there is no question it's coming. If evolution can create conscious beings from carefully positioned molecules, there's no reason to think that human's can't do it too.
Seems pretty easy to thwart facial recognition. More concerning is the fact that most of us carry around a homing beacon in our front pocket.
Super easy, just wear a different mask every day of your life! See killer drone problem solved, easy-peesy.
It is actually nothing of the sort. It is just an indicator that this smear-campaign is reasonably well organized.
And what's your evidence of a well organized smear campaign?
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."
