The two words "fork oracle" carry such power, attraction and brightness that they are enough to obfuscate anything else that was written.
Now I just need to start selling T-Shirts with that phrase on them.
... Gold is a poor conductor
Gold is a superior conductor to aluminum and not much worse than copper. I'm guessing its cost has more to do with aluminum winning out on low end shielding.
People would rarely use "most" for less than a 2/3 majority, and a lot of people (but maybe not "most" of them
Huh? Please consult ANY English Dictionary.
When you're talking about a binary variable (only two categories as here), then 'most' means a strict majority. If I have two containers and one has 10 jellybeans and the other has 9, I really hope you can determine which container has the MOST jellybeans.
Just my $0.02
There are different sizes of infinity, and therefore it is entirely possible for an infinite task to grow into a larger infinite task.
I don't see how really. The different types of infinities are different in their basic nature. For example, you can start with an infinite set with cardinality aleph0 such as the integers, and let that 'grow' all you like, taking that infinity multiplied by that infinity, raised to the power of that infinity, etc. and you'll still never get to the next 'larger infinity' with cardinality aleph1 such as that of the real numbers. They're just a fundamentally different animal. It's the difference between discrete and non-discrete.
I think it's brilliant. I don't care if somebody did it somewhere else before and deserves all the credit--that's beside the point.
Wait... are you by chance a US Patent Clerk?
Not the kind of thing you're going to do in your kitchen!
What!? You obviously have never seen my kitchen.
5$/week * 35 subscribers * 15 weeks = 9000$ ??
I'm guessing they're quoting 'yearly' figures: 35 * $5/wk * 52weeks = $9100
A person could litterally use the password abc123 and never be bruteforced
You've got to be kidding me. Just what do you think "Brute Force" means anyway, and how do you imagine such an attack is carried out?
Hint: during such an attack, there has to be SOME mechanism for determining success of each attempt.
As long as you keep it encrypted with a sufficiently strong key, is it really any different from using "one-and-only strong password for many sites"?
Yes.
When using one-strong-password for many sites you can't verify the security measures used to protect that password at any given site. They could be storing your password in plain text for all you know. Once one is compromised and linked to your personal information, that could potentially be used by an attacker to access other sites you use.
By using a keyring where only you have access to its password and how it's being treated (ie. not on some remote website), you avoid that problem.
Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach
