emphasis mine

Welcome to Web 3.0. They're banking on it. The future is turning your computer into a money making machine for them. Google's doing it by turning your page views into dollars from advertisers. Other corporations are hoping you'll use their software, they'll peek and poke around your habits, churn information that is useful to them in the hopes that they can get you to stick around and give your money to them.

The Hot Dog stands and amusement rides of today are applications like Angry Birds and such. You think the web of 1997-2000 was ad-ridden? Wait until your OS is! Apple is working on one now (or at the least, it considering it!).

Check the kitchen!

WHOA!!

%flees%

heh.

Reminds me of that song, "99 instances of bugs in the code..."

99 instances of bugs in the code...
99 instances of bugs, ....
code one out, mark it out,
106 instances of bugs in the code...
106 instances of bugs in the code...
106 instances of bugs, ....

Now *THAT's* intelligent design!

$Ducks

I guess you completely ignored the fact that the poster mentioned that police ignore most of the ADT service calls because of false alarms. You didn't even have to RTFA; It's in the summary.

Don't be such a tightwad. Get an edukation.

Calculating something that said '5318008' would have been so much cooled. sigh.

Seriously, this is simply freakin' awesome! Nice job, MaxSGB.

Good news! Some day, you'll reside in one for free!

I thought they were the "Peoples' Judean Front."

Oh, I gotta try this!

{{runs to store to buy A LOT of hard drives}}

That's good. But, this, is rich!

http://419eater.com/html/bigman2.htm

Burke? Is that you?

Just because he's going to work for a non-profit orginization doesn't means he wont be handsomely paid. I seriously doubt he'll be making as much at KA as he was at google; but, that doesn't mean he'll work for free.

Sadly, there are far too many non-profit charity orgs that pay their CEOs and upper staff wads of cash - which means very little charity is going around...except, of course, for those upper staff members.

In a word....intent.

Mind you, I've never used BTJunkie but from what I've read here.....

I think you missed the parent's point (or joke) and I think he was being ironic. I believe he meant that all CA's will learn from this is that the company should never, ever reveal that they've had a data breach.

Of course he's joking. Any company that tried to keep secret that their certs server was hacked in any way, shape or form would be subject to extortion and other legal liabilities.

Wait. Don't you mean 20/20 is hindsight?