As a rule of thumb, if you can put together a fully formed sentence, you almost certainly don't have meaningful levels of ASD.
Please provide some kind of scientific-journal citation for this assertion.
While you're looking, let me point out an underlying assumption which it appears to be making: that the verbal/written communication process is a "black box" where ideas go in one end and words come out the other, such that the quality of the cognitive process(es) generating the ideas can be reliably deduced from the quality and quantity of the words.
Please consider this alternative view: the communicative layer is not an inherent part of the cognitive processes, which lie further within the individual. There is no reason that "typical-appearing verbal/written communication" cannot be the output of a laborious and oft-fragile emulation, which is prone to occasionally crashing or producing unexpected/undesirable results. If intensive effort at this emulation manages to produce typical-looking verbal output, the individual making the effort is rewarded by being told that s/he cannot possibly be autistic. Thanks a lot for *that*.
And yes, my username is my DSM code. And yes, I was formally diagnosed, and no, I was not "faking" all the stuff which I've gone through over the years (and still sometimes do). Sheesh.
...part of the Peabody Museum. Which is part of Yale. Which (drum roll...)...
Well, at least they got the city name right. When I was in Data Systems at Southern New England Telephone (also in New Haven), I got a look at a cleaned-up list of city names in the Customer Records and Billing master database. According to it, we had at least one customer in East Fartford (rather than East Hartford), which might've shown up in "F" rather than "H" in the example you gave...
Just thought you might want to know
A list is only as strong as its weakest link. -- Don Knuth