Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Slowing down? (Score 1) 358

According to empirical science you are correct, expansion of the universe is accelerating. If the reporter can't get the simplest bits right, how can we trust what they say about the complicated stuff. I'll file this one under 'load of old bollocks'.

Comment Re:The Nook is/was excellent (Score 1) 321

Oh yes. +1 for this.

I bought two nook devices for 30 UK Pounds (must be around 45 USD) each when the line was closing. They're the 'simple touch' ones - that means they have an e-ink touch screen. I rooted mine immediately, and installed one or two extras - and a large memory card. Now I have an e-ink Android tablet, complete with the Kindle app (not that I ever use that) and all the apps I can eat. Not bad for 30 quid.

Not that I ever use it for anything but reading books. But I -could-.

Comment It doesn't look that different (Score 5, Funny) 94

I thought when you updated your Open Source desktop environment project to a new release version, you were supposed to take all the really useful tools, features and usability models that had been refined for years and chuck them all in the bin leaving you with a horrible monstrosity that was near impossible to use (and then have it remain that way for at least four years).

Surely, KDE have got this badly wrong.

Comment Re:As long as the US doesn't reign in on monopolie (Score 1) 135

Wtf? I thought this discussion was about Internet connections... why don't you just chuck some random shit in, like you're all offended because someone's comments could be construed as a criticism of your country?

Clearly you're upset because everyone in your nation is being screwed by the ISPs. But if you are, don't go defending your country by putting up bollocks arguments against what is patently obvious.

Comment This ia Communist proposal (Score 1) 338

I can understand public owned infrastructure if there is limited space or these things introduce huge public safety issues (such as come with rail or road infrastructure), but this is all about a piece of wire. If the wires were so huge that you could only run one length to service dozens of houses (such as you get with a road) you might have a good argument. But this patently isn't the case.

It's far better not to rely on one network, as doing so introduces a monopoly, and creates its own problems when services fail. What you really want is at least two, and preferably many more network providers that run wires to large numbers of homes. That brings healthy competition which in turn brings lower prices and better service.

Comment Re:Where's my rate cut? (Score 1) 135

As a customer, the download rate you'll be getting has nothing to do with infrastructure quality or how much you pay, it's determined by some cosy little deal between your ISP and a movie provider. You have no freedom to enter a contract knowing what you're buying from your ISP - so it sounds like a class action suit could do very well.

But then again, the network infrastructure is owned by the ISP - they can charge what they like for it and to whoever they like. What you really need is competition, at least one other network infrastructure provider. That'd kick the protectionist blackguard ISP to change their stupid policy over throttling.

Comment Re:As long as the US doesn't reign in on monopolie (Score 2) 135

What's that I smell?

In this case, it's garbage. i live in the UK, and I had five different options for providers for my Internet connection. If one was throttling my connection, I'd go elsewhere. The only reason Verizon and Comcast get away with this is because they have a cosy little cartel, and together hold Netflix to ransom.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...