Lets hear it for the most transparent administration in history!

Sounds like the debate/hofstra thinks they have a license for that band and don't have to accept any and all interference like FCC Part15 specifies. I don't think this will end well for them.

Where are my mod points when I need them. That's hilarious

How ironic. A fedgov payed troll calling out a russian paid troll.

NIST 800 is the computer security committee. Let them come out with a standard and allow independent verification of compliance, kinda like a UL listing. Lets see if people want to pay for security.

No talk of Li Ching-Yuen, the possibly oldest man in recorded history?

I think we've just found the real reason they changed the software. It wasn't because it f'ed over a bunch of users. Its because a few people realized they could own everything for free.

Have any of them actually gotten hart rate working correctly, or are they all approximations based on vaso-dilation or some such, like fitbit?

Yes you are reading that wrong. That only applies to people who have sued SSA for not declaring them disabled, and to people over retirement age.

Could be both.

"You say that as if there is a finite number of passengers. "
Are you suggesting there are an infinite number of people on Earth?

"Since 666 isn't the number of the beast but 619 is due it being off by one in the originally written language it is even funnier.
Ancient Hebrew numerical system left much to be desired and has opened up more cans of worms and confusion than Americans complaining about socialistic meteric system."

How amusing. You know that the Book of Revelation was written in Greek and not in Aramean let alone Hebrew right?

I'm not defining where the productivity should go. If there market weren't so distorted by government it would allocate it better than any person. What I am pointing out is that this is another version of the Broken Window Fallacy

So your answer is that the governmental regulations and taxes(permitting and hearings) are the majority of the cost. That isn't an economic argument for solar being the better option. Your simply stating that the governments have chosen solar as the winner. And that also leads back to my argument that it is in fact misallocation of resources. You are clearly economically ignorant. I suggest you go read Hayak's The Road to Serfdom .

The majority cost in every product is labour. You are stating that there are more labor costs in solar and wind than in other. Then saying it is cheaper. It can't be cheaper and require more labour. That is why its a terrible idea. Indeed even Obama said it would cost more when he famously said that your electric bill would go up under his plan.