Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Comment Re: I see Apple watches being worn in public place (Score 1) 406

Why would people "hate" it? It's largely irrelevant, puts electromagnetism in your wrist 24/7, requires one more thing to charge, looks "funny" to me, and I have never desired it, even if FREE. However, I reslly like my iPhone (an Android would be ok too, but I like iOS better). It is extremely suspicious to see the maker of iWatch to be having to point out hiw it's a worldwide success: it's not at all. A good product? Maybe. No maker is losing sleep over it. They may fear Apple TV and iPod and iPad only. But the problem is not the iWatch, but the fact that Apple has not done anything or even tried to do anything with anough balls to question a bugget market. The last time I though Wow, was with the ipad 2 release. Since then, we have a billion form factors for iPhone and "lock in" ..."ecosystem" prodcuts that want to draw a fee circles around their "captive market".

I am ready to leave Apple any moment another company pushes forward like Jobs did, bringing something that makes me reconsider how I achieve things.

Even simple thing like "Echo" are more innovative. Amazon serms to be innovating in many fronts even if they don't create huge new ideas, they try innovative things every month. Apple is just extrapolation of Jobs vision like a linear regression. When the market takes a turn, Apple will not be ready, and they certainly ain't leading it anymore.

Comment Re: Customer Survey Discovers iOT Device Are Usele (Score 1) 181

If it weren't so true. I avoid IoT unless I trully needed. It's not that I don't believe in automation and control. It's just that Internet per se is 't the right choice and I don't want an orchestra of things that anderstand little or nothing of what I want or need.

Comment Re: Of course not. (Score 1) 432

People has less hope today that in the past. Just look how many in gen X have no saving to retire, how baby boomers are still working and hiw millenials trust more in propaganda like transformer, Jarvis or x-men than in something more profound. You can still be very happy, but if you want just take a look at suicide rates which climed 24% since 1999 and are at 30-years records. Many more people take that sad desperate route today than before, and aomething is causing it. Woman are especially vulnerable, more so older woman which now commit auicide 64% more often than before. The problem you have is that you see this as a debate. There is no debate about what is happening. My guess is anti-pressants are a band aid, and since the root problem is never assessed, many times the right diagnosis or treatment arrives way too late when too much harm has clouded the body. I had people that really went through really harsh times, and the beat advise is to go out meet people, pray and exercise.

Comment Re: Hearing Aid Batteries (Score 1) 253

Amen. And by the way they would not just be better products, they would actually get more miney from me. The reason I no longer buy any music, and iCoukd storage, any radio and any movies (and any Airpods) is that I don't like being cattled around like I was some farm animal. Yet, I still have many many apps, an Apple laptop, 3 iphones and 2 iPads. Android is crossing my mind with offers like Pixel, but I am hanging out just a little longer. I really despice using dongles and I think they are extremely unflattering to the user. Even the watch makes prople look "funny" in not the right way. I don't care about the cost much, but I am not cattle and I don't like unflattering products.

Comment Re: Because "bad" taxes (Score 1) 124

It's a marketing move. And a commitment to China over US. Yes, Apple knows they contributed a huge amount to China and Asia, and now that Asians can afford iPhone's that's they only growth hope with no other new product to dell than a watch that very few people care about. If Apple could avoid paying any tax in the US they would. If the US didn't command a huge amiunt of revenue and was where they started they'd have moved somewhere else already. I am also not sure why people expect companies to behave any differently when economic theory asks comoanies to just maximize profut for shareholders. Anything else that seems good is risky (competition) and not in the shareholder interest.

Cebturied hace passed and consumers haven't realized that they ultimately have the stronger power of all. Buy people are easily divided, missguided and they are usually unable to work together for a better world.

A real progressive world would be obe dominated by a strong coherent buyers ruling party. Apple could be forced to do whatever buyers wanted so long as we could agree on what we consumers want from corporations and the best way to influence them. For it to work people would vote with their wallets en masse, and woukd need to sacrifice small things like which variant of a huge number of products to use very occasionally: most companies woukd have to listen carefully and just comply.

Comment Re: They could always work elsewhere. (Score 1) 433

They could at least TRY. The owner is one of the richest persons on earth and has made a business of destroying local shops because his system is better IF you exclude de employment side (which buyer don't experience directly). Starbucks charged more, and pays growers extra vs market price in what is the fair price program. You could argue that Starbucks doesn't need that, but guess what? Many people like to pay a bit more and know those growing the crops can have a better pay for growing coffee usually with hugely difficult personal conditions.

Why Amazon can't have a "2-day Fair Price Shipping"

I think smart people miss the chance to say, people working at very low wages for thinks I need should get paid market price, but something better. And it is MUCH BETTER to fund working people through thise that can aford to help a bit (millions and millions) that it is to have the governement comoeting with thanda m so they don't starve as this results in: 1) rise and ultimate takeover by populism 2) many people that prefer no work at all vs a small premium for doing a huge effort for some extra bucks

We need those up the wealth chain to be able to pay a bit more so workers earn a decent living and have a chance to enjoy a fairer planet.

The last thing to note is that in a world where there are more people that need to work to eat than jobs (this happens city by city, is not linear) then workers have no negotiaring power. During the industrial revolution people would die on mines, children would work. It was a hugely sad time with some jobs costing parents their lives in mines for just food. It was a huge factor that many of these emigrated to the US to built the country Slashdot lives on. Today, there is nowhere to go.

Where are the efforts to investigate hie to get everyone to contribute their lives and work hard for a future designed to include everyone living on this floor? Let's asume we don't need everyone to work with our current direction. What ideas can we have to need everyone? If we can figure it out we can avoid turning our future into the dystopian metropolis movie or the 20-25 movies that note this (Oblivion and so many others), and we can also avoid it turning it into Venezuela of sorts that cause the sane problems but without any progress at all.

I'd pay a bit more shipping and would like Amazon to think they have no interest in contributing something in the world of extreme automation they are forging for society.

Amazon, wake up!

Slashdot Top Deals

A freelance is one who gets paid by the word -- per piece or perhaps. -- Robert Benchley