2. Start building
3. Sign with NASA
4. ???
5. Profit!
wait...
There is no step four, just sign the billion dollar contracts and hope that they don't notice that they prototype is made out of cardboard before your private jet takes off...
That means that the laptops are not the students. That means that the school still owns the laptops. While the parents are responsible for stating what software can be installed on their personal computer, until the student graduates and purchases the laptop, it is not their personal computer.
As far as filtering websites and content, why not? You probably have filters in the library or any other PC that the kids have access to don't you? Set them up the same way.
Worried about them installing software, then don't give them permissions on the device to do so. Lock that down. Don't let them install anything. That means you don't have to worry about them getting trojans. You don't ahve to worry about unlicensed software that you may be liable for since the school owns the laptop. Again, IANAL so I don't know what can happen there, but the RIAA is sue happy so who knows.
Congress isn't passing any laws.
besides, it's already been deemed legal for places such as libraries to put restrictions on devices, whether it's to block porn or unsafe website.
Lots of stuff can come shooting up out of the hole, such as the dirt and mud that they are displacing, and any magma that they happen to hit along the way.
Nobody is saying that we have text books stating that the earth is flat, but that they have examples of items used to prove points, where the example is no longer relevant.
I've been out serious classes for about 10 years, so if you want specifics, sorry, I can't cite page numbers. But I do remember times where we were given handouts that had something different than the texts because later evidence made the example inaccurate. Whether it's deciding whether to call it brontosaurus or apatosaurus, or whether the Pachycephalosaurus rammed like a mountain goat or swung it's head like a club. And more recently and not dinosaur related, whether pluto is a planet.
Scientific theory may remain the same, however individual examples used to prove said theory may later be shown as hoaxes or incorrectly labeled.
The real problem would be in how do you prove that they got the legal documents without getting a subpeona for the records from Facebook. With registered mail, a signature is required, but with facebook messages, there is no proof unless facebook releases the logs showing that it was read.
It happens. I'm not sure about in college classes where you generally have to buy your own books for every class, but some high schools may have some older books still in use.
Likewise, I have seen shows on the Discovery channel and it's networks, that would say one thing about scientific item, then the next show would say something else. Or one would talk about a hoax, and the next would cite the hoax as a source.
It happens. Doesn't mean that I'm a creationist looking to undermine something, I'm just saying that old books and shows may not have the right information, and they can still be in circulation.
as long as I find it fun, I can keep paying and playing even if I suck.
Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.