Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Dead or just temporarily unusable? (Score 1) 331

The benefit of DisplayLink is that you don't need a large proprietary docking station connector. Just USB-C. The "docking station" is essentially a USB hub, USB graphics card (DisplayLink makes this part), USB sound card, and USB ethernet chip, all in one box, that connects to the host using USB-C.

Comment Re:Both docker and kubernetes are just front-ends. (Score 1) 98

Windows now has native container features. The docker situation there has gotten quite confused; "Docker for Windows" creates a Hyper-V virtual machine and runs Linux containers on it, or it can be switched to "Windows containers" mode where it runs Windows containers directly on the host machine, like it would Linux containers on a Linux host.

It's going to get even more confused, too, because Windows is gaining the ability to run Linux containers "natively".

Comment Re:Both docker and kubernetes are just front-ends. (Score 1) 98

Kubernetes is not at all a front-end to Linux's isolation features. Kubernetes doesn't include any container engine. Most people use Docker's container engine with Kubernetes.

Kubernetes is a system for scheduling containers across a set of worker nodes, and includes features that make that easier, like service discovery and load balancing.

Comment Re:Proof of work (Score 1) 227

Full disclosure: I read all of Atlas Shrugged. I also read The Fountainhead, but it's not very good. I am not an Objectivist, and I am not a Libertarian.

Ayn Rand never agreed with Libertarians. In fact, she said she'd be more likely to come to an understanding with a Marxist than a Libertarian: http://aynrandlexicon.com/ayn-...

Objectivism says you should do what's objectively in your best interest. Libertarians do what's in someone else's (Koch Industries, most likely) best interest and hope that somehow the benefits will flow to them.

Comment Re: LOL, crybaby snowflake blames everyone else. (Score 1) 711

3) Competitiveness and ability to handle stress are not good reasons to promote one employee over another. Promoting the top performers at one level to a higher level is actually bad business practice. It ensures that everyone is promoted to their level of maximum incompetence. Studies where employees were promoted AT RANDOM showed better outcomes than when promotion was based on current employee performance.

The fact that it's not a good reason doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Business makes bad, short-sighted decisions all the time. Unfortunately, they're run by humans, who are also known for making bad, short-sighted decisions.

Slashdot Top Deals

Scientists will study your brain to learn more about your distant cousin, Man.

Working...