Consider SVG:
path d="M153 334 C153 334 151 334 151 334 C151 339 153 344 156 344 C164 344 171 339 171 334 C171 322 164 314 156 314 C142 314 131 322 131 334 C131 350 142 364 156 364 C175 364 191 350 191 334 C191 311 175 294 156 294 C131 294 111 311 111 334 C111 361 131 384 156 384 C186 384 211 361 211 334 C211 300 186 274 156 274" style="fill:white;stroke:red;stroke-width:2" /
and the equivalent XAML:
Path Data="M153 334 C153 334 151 334 151 334 C151 339 153 344 156 344 C164 344 171 339 171 334 C171 322 164 314 156 314 C142 314 131 322 131 334 C131 350 142 364 156 364 C175 364 191 350 191 334 C191 311 175 294 156 294 C131 294 111 311 111 334 C111 361 131 384 156 384 C186 384 211 361 211 334 C211 300 186 274 156 274" Fill="White" Stroke="Red" StrokeThickness="2" /
The two are so similar a simple Perl script could easily do the conversion. So why the resistance to support SVG by Microsoft? (Certainly the implementation is trivial given the Silverlight codebase). And why the hating on XAML? It seems obvious that its feature set was heavily influenced by SVG.
Let's merge the two (or not) and move on to more important things.
Just recently had to edit the Host file. (Local DNS file). Could not save it because of UAC, and didn't get a UAC prompt either, had to give up and disable UAC first.
No need to do that. Right click on the editor program of choice and choose Run As Administrator. You can now edit (and save!) your hosts file.
If this is something you do often you can create a shortcut (click Advanced on the Shortcut tab to set run as admin).
Are they going to blow up the sun next?
"If you have the solarbonite, you have nothing!"
I'm not sure how you get from "a lot of things that resemble SVG" to "trivial for MS to support". Just because the output has similar features doesn't mean the back-end is anything alike.
Except that you can take SVG data, change the formatting slightly (e.g. with a Perl script), feed it into XamlPad and get your vector output displayed. I'd say that was fairly trivial.
I once believed in creationism, but slowly, over time, I changed.
It's time we stopped referring to them as creationist and start calling them what they really are: evolution deniers.
Congratulations on your enlightenment by the way. It takes an open mind to weigh the evidence and change your point of view. You are to be commended.
... the developer is finished
...
Next time they might want to consider putting two developers on the project.
Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.