Comment Re:Security by stupidity? (Score 1) 141
either the people installing these things are lazy, or the companies selling them are giving lousy security advise.
"It's not that I'm lazy.....It's that I just don't care"
either the people installing these things are lazy, or the companies selling them are giving lousy security advise.
"It's not that I'm lazy.....It's that I just don't care"
LOL yes. "AT the Polynesian"
Damn you slashdot, why can't we edit comments.
Oh please. This is Disney for fsck sake, not the freaking federal government.
Or are you worried Disney might let the FBI know how many time you rode It's a Small World and ate the Polynesian
Reread the thread. AC posted a comment about Assange
Or did you perhaps mean Bruce Schneier?
Cut her some slack.... she is after all a girl "in training"
Or your competitor has a friend at the SEC
I thought a MOOC was the guy who hung out with Thundarr the Barbarian.
No, no, no. The MOOC's invaded Spain in the 8th century.
Ok, new slogan
"Tastes like shit, but at least it doesn't melt in your hands"
Wow....very little discussion on this thread.
Perhaps all the nerds heads exploded when they could decide whether to oppose overreaching copyright laws and exploitation of their beloved LOTR.
Really? I was thinking more like "Don't let the door hit you on the way out..........bitch"
Say what you will about Digg.com, but at least they offered the option to bury shit "stories" like this
I just cast a paper ballot an hour ago.
Same here. It's a simple to use system with a built in paper trail.
Only thing I'd like to see to improve it is verification that the reader recorded your vote correctly.
Just a simple LCD display showing your voting selections.
Paper also beats rock.
Well, there is a different outcome at most every 8 years, sometimes more often than that.
TL;DR
Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.
