Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google

Google+ Already At 10 Million Users 1223

An anonymous reader writes "I project that Google will easily pass 10 million users tomorrow and could reach 20 million user by this coming weekend if they keep the Invite Button available. As one G+ user put it, it is easy to underestimate the power of exponential growth." I bet if people post in the discussion that they need invites, we can scratch each other's backs here. I've been using Google+ for a few days now (Yes I will put you in a circle ;) and have a lot to love, but unless I can gate twitter and Facebook, the best interface in the world won't help me until I can convince my kids' grandparents to move.

Comment Re:what we need to avoid this (Score 1) 887

That's a terrible idea. They're not going to put the only copy of the data in front of you on your own laptop for you to type what the hell you want and tamper with the only copy of evidence. They'll clone the drive and have you decrypt that copy.

Then, when they don't believe that all you had were copies of hello.jpg they'll compare the disk with the original, see all the unrelated blocks being written to, and know for sure that you have hidden data. Plus evidence that you've attempted to destroy evidence from their investigation.

Image

Jeff & Rob Visit Lucasfilm 198

Last fall Hemos started working for Perforce: one of their clients is Lucasfilm. One thing led to another, and last week I got to visit their Presidio facility in San Francisco. Their security policies prevent me from saying anything about the super sweet things I saw inside the building, but I can post this picture of us next to the Yoda statue outside the front door. Thanks to Matt Janulewicz for getting us in the front door and showing us around, Daryll Jacobson for opening a cool door and Tina Mills for pressing click. I can now say that I've been physically closer to Starwars.com than I have to Slashdot.org since the 1998 when it lived under my desk. Finally, the gauntlet has been thrown: if you work somewhere cool (Pixar? Apple? NASA? The White House? Comerica Park?) drop me an email! I am not above using T-Shirts as bribery to see cool places!

Comment Re:Open-ness is good (Score 1) 220

So daily bandwidth caps are good because someone on Slashdot talks about downloading copyrighted content. You're right; it's obvious when you put it like that.

Clearly this whole "media" thing is clouding the issue, so let's come up with a different example: my bandwidth also gets throttled every time I download a 1.8GB ultra-high res image of an ocelot's vagina, which I do in my role as an ocelot gynaecologist. Or, you know, to fap over.

I'm glad we've finally found some common ground.

Comment Re:Open-ness is good (Score 2) 220

...which is very reasonable for all but the most hardcore bandwidth users...

No. Superficially it might seem so, but in practice it sucks. Because the caps are applied on a daily basis, it's very easy to hit the cap due to one session of heavy downloading. As an example, I'm on the 10Mbit service - at the risk of losing my geek card, I just don't need a faster download than that and so object to paying for it. This means that in the evening I get a DL cap of 1.5GB, which is roughly the size of a 720p TV show rip. So if I want to download 2 episodes, or a full length film, or Linux ISOs + associated software, I will hit the cap. Even though my daily usage only ends up being a couple of hundred MB averaged over the month.

And to the commenter suggesting we should schedule torrents:

  1. I don't leave my computer on when I'm not using it; it's a waste of electricity
  2. If I wanted my Linux ISOs to arrive a day after I decided I want them, I'd order a CD online. And if your 50Mbit connection takes 24 hours to download 650MB, then it is in no meaningful way 50Mbit.

Comment Looks like bad benchmarking (Score 2) 176

The Flash text benchmark is highly suspicious. IE9 posts by far the worst score for that benchmark on one machine, then beats FF on the same test on another machine. Without any description of testing methodology, I can only assume the benchmarking procedure is totally broken (e.g. maybe they only ran each one once) and so the results are best taken with a pinch of salt, even if they're not entirely useless.

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...