Comment Re:Again, again (Score 1) 61
5. Profit.
5. Profit.
Thanks for the response. I did the same searching and found the same [apparent] claim online. Various sites claim "no hono[u]r among thieves" as the meaning of Proverbs 1:16, but that seems highly iffy. Good ol' Biblical bull!
Is that the actual Proverbs 1:16 text (even amongst its many translations)?
Man, such negativity, simply pointing out that Google's search is utter crap, and has been for a couple of years, is not worthy of such bile.
Pointless
The web page at https://bf15845f0d65fceacd904e... might be temporarily down or it may have moved permanently to a new web address.
ERR_BLOCKED_BY_ADBLOCKER
Amazon is already an aggregator for cheap Chinese knock-offs and general tat.
completely unreadable?
Read what I *wrote*, about the concurrencies.
It was a rushed job that had to get done, because a Chinese lab intentionally let an engineered virus onto their people. This is not disputed anymore [...]
Nope. It's not disputed anymore. You're just mistaken about it.
You might want to re-read the Brandenburg v. Ohio concurrencies. Shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theatre is given as an example of a rare case where such speech *can* be prosecuted, because it is "a classic case where speech is brigaded with action."
Why is it so difficult to use explicitic wording?
If I knew what that is, I might try.
And since when do governments do things correctly? Look at that state of infrastructure around much of the world. Are laws passed for the benefit of society or for the benefits of elites? There is a housing shortage in much of the world. Why should we trust government with something new when it constrains the supply of urgently needed housing? It's gotten to the point that gen Z is being completely impoverished by artificially high rents and making buying a home only possible for a small fraction.
Ever consider that IP is responsible for a huge proportion of income inequality. Copyright is justified in terms of benefits to society only when it's about 7 years. Yet it keeps on growing. It now even applies to buildings. They want to even apply it to clothing. Our governments have completely failed us.
What I see is a battle of elites. Silicon Valley vs various governments. Such competition is healthy as it keeps power dispersed and allows for new ideas and groups to coalesce. I read a thesis that it was the war of religions in the 16th century and beyond that enabled the growth of the idea of democracy - elites were too busy fighting each other to stop new democratic ideas and groups from emerging.
When said and done, the social agenda of much of these companies is very similar to much of the government anyway. I'm surprised that elites care that much. They both support censorship and newer (last 30 years) progressive ideas. Maybe it's all about who is in charge, not what happens when they are.
When "action" and "reaction" aren't well-defined, or even sensible. For example, during preacceleration of a charged particle (the Abraham-Lorentz force).
And in the case in question, where entropy is generated.
You're correct. The poster above you, who claims an obvious and inescapable result, is ignorant of the physics involved (which is why it makes a compelling problem in the first place, and is why it entered the collection of stories about/around/by Feynman).
The committee hearing focused on possible compensation for victims of what has been called "the worst miscarriage of justice in British history."
How short and insular people's memories are.
Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.