Comment Re:Students know studies are useless (Score 1) 119
Thinking AI is going to take over the world is like how the Segway was supposed to change the world.
+1 Insightful
Thinking AI is going to take over the world is like how the Segway was supposed to change the world.
+1 Insightful
And why not? Construct the deck automatically in a factory, roll out a bot to dig some holes for the posts, attach the deck. Done.
Plumbing? The robot won't care about the stench so can really get in there.
Pave a road? Why not? A robot slowly rolling along dropping asphalt, another rolling slowly behind it to smoothe the asphalt.
If you think hard physical labor is the only thing that can't be replaced by robots I've got news for ya.
Said by someone who never fixed a sewer leak (or any plumbing for that matter), or installed more than one deck at an actual home. The road asphalt - sure, so long as it's akin to tilling farmland or harvesting crops.
Proxmox is not really a vmware replacement no matter (snip) It's not a replacement for anyone outside of a small business.
Um, why contradict yourself?
Once upon a time, VMWare was not worthy of giant company workloads. It has since grown up. Perhaps Proxmox can grow up too?
Agree it's classy, but do you have examples where a chairman of a big international company would have harsh words in a similar situation? I imagine when there is an issue with a self-driving car model, the competitor CEO doesn't go publicly "what a bunch of idiots". Or if say Google is hacked by bad actors and Microsoft is asked about it (or the opposite), I also expect classy words.
Yes!
I can imagine Musk would not follow the rule but he's really an exception.
Oh, well... you took one of them away.
Back in the day, Walt Disney pretty specifically spoke out about Pacific Ocean Park and Knott's Berry Farm. He never publicly called them idiots, and operationally they coordinated their calendars, but he was unabashedly willing to point out publicly how Disneyland was better especially when they weren't keeping up. I don't have a google link to share, however....
+1 Informative
There are classy ways to thank industry situations for their growth without thumbing their nose. His publicly-spoken words don't change the fact that it's classy.
As right as he is, Mr. Faury is very classy to say it. As someone who works in a MUCH smaller industry, I have aired similar concerns within my vertical when one of our "competitors" loses, shrinks, or has trouble.
You made an interesting attempt, but I still think you don't understand the question asked of the OP.
Asbestos, as found in brake pads, is friable.
Brake dust, on the road, will not sink to the ground as if it's magnetically charged and attracted to asphalt. Vehicles and the turbulence of their wheels will stir this stuff up and it will be inhaled by the many drivers that come after. Not to mention homes that live near freeways... but I digress.
Your post suggests I don't consider asbestos to be a problem - I never suggested asbestos lacked problems.
I'm merely curious why the abundance of it on American roadways hasn't led to cases. It's not the wrong question, and it has nothing to do with use cases.
After all, the giant fund set up to pay victims is far from exhausted -- back in the day, it was feared it was way too little.
I'm not arguing the merits of asbestos, and I know asbestos used weaned in the 90s. If you reread my post, perhaps you'll be back on topic - it was a sincere question.
From the fine summary: "it's too early to make specific recommendations about intermittent fasting based on his research alone."
Thanks for the nothingburger, slashdot!
Speaking an an ex-Industrial Hygienist with 10 years in the profession: you are so very very wrong. Look up the word "friable"
I'd appreciate yours thoughts/opinion on why it is the billions of stop and go freeway miles throughout the 70s and 80s didn't lead to an epidemic of mesothelioma.
The issue is that it's failing while flying, and you seem to be suggesting this wasn't important enough to maintain or inspect.
I'm implying that, if this was an Airbus, it wouldn't have made the news at all. But this stuff happens to Airbus planes as well. And, absolutely, the airlines need to do a much better job of maintaining and inspecting their airplanes. They have been slacking, and the FAA has been slacking in their oversight.
I gather from your post that Airbus is slacking too, given things fall off their planes as well?
This is a 20 year old plane. It's either a maintenance or inspection issue, or it's just a 20 year old piece of hardware that's been used tens of thousands of hours, and it's simply failing.
Yes yes, things fall from the sky so often that it makes the news. You cite several odd issues as if they are the same as an exterior panel falling off. The issue is that it's failing while flying, and you seem to be suggesting this wasn't important enough to maintain or inspect. If I can't count on ground crews to inspect the visible stuff, what _can_ I count on? How many funerals need planning before we decide that 20 year old airplanes should be inspected and maintained correctly?
Agreed regarding culture wars.
Not sure I agree regarding visionaries - anyone can have a crazy dream, fewer can execute, and even fewer understand what _could_ work. We remember the winners because the winners can do all three....
As to your cost workup, it is interesting that Disney attracts so many in spite of being expensive. They must be doing something right, I suppose.
An anecdote - I've been on an actual safari, as well as on the safari ride at their Animal Kingdom park, I must express how well Disney did. I saw more in 2 hours (including waiting in the queue) than I saw in a full day in Nakuru or Hlane or Mhkaya. I wholeheartedly recommend the real safaris, but I found Disneys's version to be amazing.
Less jet lag too.
I asked him but thanks for joining. Now you're taking her to DW for a few thousand dollars as a follow up?
Disneyland, actually. I live much closer.
If you want your questions answered privately, ask them privately.
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."
