How is that a response? It has nothing to do with what I said.

"Maybe because the only dirty player in this election is the Clinton team?"

Are you shitting me?

If that was the case why just threaten them to shut off his internet? Why not make them expel him from the embassy so he can be taken into custody since that's what they really want?

I keep hearing this stupid talking point. I don't like what Assange is doing right now because he's trying to manipulate our election. If he wasn't exclusively trying to harm Clinton and if he just released them instead of timing the releases for the most damage and if the releases actually contained something worth giving a damn about I would be ok about it. But as it is what he's doing has nothing to do with transparency and that's why he's lost so much respect.

It means if they are much safer than human drivers it doesn't really matter who they are prioritizing since everyone will be benefitting still.

Casting audio is much better than using Bluetooth from your phone. That said, you can use a cheap Chromecast Audio if you dint want the smarts in the speaker itself.

Interesting, that does sound like it would be much better.

Early voting has already started in some places, if you want to swing a vote it helps to act before the voting is done.

No, the initial promise was that the message wouldn't be stored on Google's servers and that is still the case. The author of the article is just confused.

But the original Verge article only says that Google won't store your messages on their servers, it's not talking about storing them on your phone. And now this article is saying the same thing, the messages will be kept on your phone but not on Google's servers. No change.

Whoever wrote this article is confused.

Doesn't matter if 4K TVs are outselling HD ones, most people aren't buying new TVs. It will take at least 5 years before they are common in people's homes.

Actually they're just like computers as that's what they are.

Well, a larger brain has more neurons, and so more connections which makes it inherently more complex as well. The question is what are the additional neurons being used for, intelligence isn't the only possible answer.

They have, but it doesn't get much attention.
https://www.washingtonpost.com...

I guess a part of the problem is that it's been common knowledge among informed people for years that Trump is a fraud, so yet more evidence of it doesn't seem very interesting. Clinton seems to get held to a much higher standard since people actually expect competence from her.

Trump is a crook with a long history of lying, illegal activity, and corruption. Real corruption too, not just accusations flung repeatedly until something sticks. And he's the one with the well documented history of stealing people's money and leaving them with nothing. I can understand why Trump projects his flaws onto Clinton, but I'm not sure what other people get out of it.