Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Typical Response from Mental Midgets (Score 5, Informative) 221

"it was that the fastest to digest and most pedestrian content would be promoted to the front page the fastest whereas any technically involved content will taper off into obscurity."

Also the fact that you can't sort by lowest rated comment, and are artificially restricted to the first 500 comments (on top of the fact that when you 'load more' it only loads like the next 20, so you can't even navigate to the downvoted comments quickly) adds to that hive mentality. It makes seeing dissenting or unpopular comments next to impossible, by design.

Comment Re:Buy APs, not Wireless Routers (Score 1) 77

I'm not sure I follow. Most home "routers" also have wifi capabilities. They allow you to connect to your ISPs modem, connect several LAN computers to the modem, as well as connect WiFi devices.

How would your setup work? Do you have a LAN router that connects to the WAN modem, and then a separate AP for Wifi devices? That seems expensive, and not easy to maintain.

Comment Regis has a point. (Score 1) 684

I'm amazed at how otherwise rational people get bamboozled into the idea of space colonization or asteroid mining, which are endeavors so expensive and perilous and with little practical value as to be impossible.

Take asteroid mining. The costs alone are incredibly prohibited, not to mention the fact that if you did mine gold, for instance, it would be the most expensive gold ever to be sold, because the costs would be so high. There will never be a point at which the rate of return on space-gold exceeds the cost.

But these techno-utopians won't listen to reason and always just dismiss the real-world or technical limitations inherit in a venture like this as Ludditism, when it's just realism.

Comment Re:Evidence of the Great Filter? (Score 5, Insightful) 365

Even within our own human population it seems that only a relatively small number of people have allowed us to advance past the age of agriculture, into the age of electronics and interconnected networks.

I don't think that's true at all. Anyone who studies technological advancement, or the philosophy of science, can tell that it's a heuristic process. In other words, it's the result of many, sometimes "average" people taking a crack at a problem over a long period of time, until someone is finally able to put all that work together to get a solution.

The oft-cited "genius" making a technological breakthrough by himself is really just a myth.

Slashdot Top Deals

TRANSACTION CANCELLED - FARECARD RETURNED

Working...