And you can get second hand Polycom conference room phones for dirt cheap too if you're on a tight budget. I don't see how/why anyone would authorize an expenditure for this very costly Microsoft product that offers nothing particularly new.
Because, to certain minds, look >> function and look + cost >> function even more
I read it like "what could we expect terrorists to figure out"
I realize they've probably all got this sort of thing turned off across all of their deployments, but I can't imagine anyone in the industry not taking this as a sign to consider alternatives to MS
Very good point! Wages have definitely been low, stayed low, and probably decreased relative to actual cost of living.
I've got a smartphone...sure, it's great. But I can't honestly say that I feel I've gotten the upfront price plus the monthly fee's worth of utility/entertainment out of it.
What's everyone else's experiences with smartphones?
It's not a strong enough signal for the rest of their analysis...
Just using clues like the names of the sellers and what other items they tended to sell, participants correctly guessed the gender of 56%, declared 35% unguessable, and got less than 9% wrong. So gender can come through if buyers are paying attention.
Ok, read up on what you pointed out. 56% of the time is hardly enough to say "oh yeah they can definitely tell"
For one, how do you know the sex of an ebay seller?
For two, are we sure it's a significant difference?
It's pretty clearly just a marketing strategy if they're not giving teams access to their tools and their reports.
It's going to be hard. They're going to have to tie a lot of desire to survive and knowledge in with a general lack of need for other human contact.
True, but it still won everyone over in Nevada.
What's great about your comment: You literally reacted to his death. You didn't exactly grandstand as a D or R but as a person that, too, will die someday, "and here's some thoughts for all of us mortals"
The real question i see nobody addressing is this. Why are all liberals so insistent on appointing a new justice before obama is gone?
Obama has almost a full year until the end of his term. If he were to agree to the argument in delaying his appointment, he'd be agreeing in deferring all major decisions until next year and would set himself up as an early "lame duck" president for a full year.
The argument might make sense if the vacancy had opened up after the election, but to agree to the Republican's demand now he'd be agreeing that he's lost the authority to make major presidential appointments and decisions for the whole year.
I'm pretty sure that's the political reason. Judicially, though, it's unheard of for the Supreme Court to go so long understaffed. It'd be setting all the wrong historical precedents. Fully two thirds of the US government would be weakened.
and opec wants the out of the market so they're flooding the market to drive the price below sustainable for fracking
In my experience it's the "morning people" that are judgey against non-morning people. It seems like it should be morning people that shouldn't hold their genes as "superior"
"What man has done, man can aspire to do." -- Jerry Pournelle, about space flight
