From that article:
This renewal is carried out by the FISA Court under the business records section of the Patriot Act. Therefore, it is lawful.
Lawful is not the same as Constitutional. I'm pretty sure that our Founding Fathers would NOT have supported this.
As you know, this is just metadata.
If it is "just" anything then why are you so concerned about collecting it?
The information goes into a database, ...
That's even worse. They're COMPILING information about citizens without even having a "reasonable suspicion" about those citizens.
... the metadata, but cannot be accessed without whatâ(TM)s called, and I quote, "reasonable, articulable suspicion" that the records are relevant and related to terrorist activity.
Who cares? If there is "reasonable, articulable suspicion" THEN you go after the records. With a WARRANT. And the warrant IDENTIFIES those SPECIFIC people you have a "reasonable, articulable suspicion" of.
As you know, and Iâ(TM)ve pointed out many times, there have been approximately 100 plots and also arrests made since 2009 by the FBI.
Go on ...
I do not know to what extent metadata was used or if it was used, but I do know this: ...
If YOU do not know then who DOES know?
And if YOU do not know then YOU should not be trying to IMPLY that there is any link between collecting this information and cracking any plots.
I do not know to what extent metadata was used or if it was used, but I do know this: That terrorists will come after us if they can and the only thing we have to deter this is good intelligence.
More of our people die when their own family kills them than die from "terrorists" in the US.
If "the only thing" that will protect us from these "terrorists" is collecting information on our own citizens then I am willing to take that risk.