Comment Re:Opsec Test (Score 1) 168
That's fine if you send ONE ticket to one person, and then question the ONE person who presents it at the theater.
That's fine if you send ONE ticket to one person, and then question the ONE person who presents it at the theater.
So it seems they like watching others just fine, but they don't like when others watch them...
They need more than watched a particular video. There is literally a less than 1 in 30,000 chance of any particular person on that list is even the person that they believe might have committed a crime.
I say LESS than since they can't even be sure that the one person they are interested in actually watched the video while logged in as themselves on YouTube.
Unfortunately, these days being investigated is itself somewhat punitive and can even be expensive. There will be no compensation. For that reason, we really need for them to have a bit more to go on than watched a particular video on YouTube.
The error before MCAS activated was that the autopilot nosed the plane down due to relying on a single malfunctioning sensor, and they were simultaneously warned that the plane was flying too fast and that the plane was flying too slow. The apparent existence of two opposing warning conditions should have disengaged any automatic actions of any kind as the system was clearly hopelessly confused.
At some point, claiming pilot error just doesn't cut it. It's like saying all you had to do was recite the Lord's Prayer backwards while hopping on one foot, rubbing your belly clockwise with your left hand and signing the preamble to the Constitution with your right hand. Do not under any circumstances press the button marked emergency.
They were being simultaneously warned that they were going too slow, going too fast, and they must not descend. The pilot correctly decided too fast and don't descend were the true warnings so he moved the controls in a way that should have been corrective, then MCAS said, no lets auger the thing into the ground instead.
This isn't about using fusion to generate energy, it's about using fusion to produce a higher velocity thrust allowing more efficient use of propellant at a cost of more energy input required.
Given a large solar panel or fission power, the propellant itself is the scarce resource.
The whole thing could be solved with a few Diffie-Hellman exchanges over the existing CAN bus. Including the "problem" of granting the owner full access to everything without letting bad actors in.
And prescriptions?
OK Marge, I promise. No deer for a month!"
Oh no, they place high value on their customers trusting them. That's why they hire the best liars marketing has to offer. Being trustWORTHY on the other hand is near the bottom of the list.
So you advocate to abolish the DEA and make all drugs OTC? I suppose you also advocate abolishing the licensing of medical practice entirely? Unless or until those answers are yes, you are interfering with the free market.
Naturally, the FDA would become just a division of the FTC.
Most people can see a giant can of worms in that, including most of the right. I don't even see Libertarians advocating for the abolition of licensing and prescriptions anymore. especially the few that have actually managed to be elected. But if we're going to regulate any of that, we must also regulate costs to keep them from going out of control.
Oddly enough, one reason we here more about the shingles vaccine is that in the past occasional exposure to kids with chickenpox acted a bit as an immune booster in adults. Now with the kids vaccinated against it, older adults need a vaccine to boost their immunity back up.
Yes, that would also be a confounding factor.
Also, a breakdown by substance would be enlightening. My suspicion is that some "hard drugs" like various hallucinogens (also useful for cluster and possibly migraine headaches) probably contributed few problems. If a clean source was available, I would say likely no deaths as well. If the source was amateurs picking random likely looking mushrooms, there may have been a few deaths.
No. If you can obtain ANY key card in the hotel for long enough to read it, you can then make a pair of cards that will open any card lock in the hotel. So you get the card for room 123. You can now open any room you want.
Worst case, you rent a room for the night. But you can probably take advantage of a distraction to grab a turned in keycard from the front desk or lift one off of a guest.
Man must shape his tools lest they shape him. -- Arthur R. Miller