Awaiting Netcraft confirmation of its demise.
This is a radical idea, but maybe they don't want to work in tech? It certain seems that no matter how much they try to create a welcoming environment, women simply do not want to work in tech.
For all his awkwardness, maybe James Damore was on to something? You know, that something that got him fired for daring to suggest men and women are attracted to different things.
Programming used to be female-dominated, only a mere 60 years ago. More importantly, modern humans first appeared around 300,000 years ago, while "tech" careers have been around for only a mere eyelash of a blink of that time. It strains credulity to say that there's an inherent biological sex difference due to hundreds of thousands of years of evolution that is (a) that strong and pervasive throughout the population to have the effect we see today, and (b) flipped in only the past two generations.
3) A class of first-class workers (women) dominates the workplace, that you cannot argue nor contradict. As a female quitting is much worse than a male quitting.
So you have an example of these businesses that were male dominated but now have first-class female workers that can't be argued with or contradicted?
Nobody would SWAT anybody if it didn't come with a risk of death, that's literally why they are doing it.
I'm sorry but that's horseshit. People act as an outright nuisance all the time without the goal of killing people. e.g. calling in fake bomb threats, accusing someone of something they didn't do, etc.
That's his point - there are tons of ways to be an outright nuisance that are nonetheless safe. SWATting carries the possibility of death. It'd be closer to calling in a bomb threat... and also planting a bomb.
Machines have less problems. I'd like to be a machine. -- Andy Warhol