A dose of hypocrisy is perhaps inevitable in an organisation the size of Microsoft. Critics level a more fundamental charge against its foreign policy, however. Where, they ask, does itâ"and fellow tech giantsâ"derive the legitimacy to be independent actors on the international stage? This is the wrong question to pose. As businesses, they have every right to defend the interests of shareholders, employees and customers. As global ones, their priorities may differ from those of their home countryâ(TM)s elected officials. And as entities which control much of the worldâ(TM)s digital infrastructure, they should have a say in designing the international norms which govern it. At a time when many governments refuse to lead, why should the firms not be allowed to? Especially if, like Microsoftâ(TM)s, their efforts blend principles with pragmatism.
How does your company deal with the ever more complex realities of world politics?
"I am, therefore I am." -- Akira