Comment Re:They've had these for years (Score 1) 291
Neither was Dr. Sbaitso - it was really just a simple Eliza-style program. The fun part was the text-to-speech.
Neither was Dr. Sbaitso - it was really just a simple Eliza-style program. The fun part was the text-to-speech.
Oh, and don't forget The Big Bang Theory. Classic.
WHEATON!!!!!
I'm not sure that's a reasonable question. A more reasonable question is, does it replace the features in Outlook that you actually use?
I have had to use Outlook for email in most organisations I've worked for (and out of the Office suite it is the only one I actually use regularly); admittedly I'm a developer and am therefore not a typical Office user, however I probably only used 50% of its functionality - basic email (with formatting), meeting requests, some very basic scheduling and task management. Not every user's usage of Outlook is going to be that simplistic but I would bet that one of the applications above would meet all of the needs of many users.
On the other hand, one massive hole that is still not really filled (although it is still being actively worked on) is Exchange connectivity, and I would imagine this would be a showstopper for adoption in many offices.
It'll definitely open documents that Office can't; however as for OOo Writer being able to save changes to documents in docx format without corrupting them, that's another story - at least anecdotally in my case. I got bitten just the other night - when I reopened a docx file I had previously edited I discovered that an entire table I had filled with text had vanished, much to my chagrin. As I had a requirement to fill in the document I had no choice but to find a Windows machine and use Word to edit it.
Now, maybe I wasn't using the absolute latest and greatest version of OOo (3.2, Go-OO version - actually, Writer 3.2.0-7ubuntu4.1 to be exact), and it did warn me initially about saving in a non-native format, but still, I was very frustrated by the loss. I hope this is the sort of thing they are working on.
And if you do, why not just use Sqllite?
http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/PIM/Akonadi#Why_not_use_sqlite.3F
In most situations you'd be right. However, Microsoft has a monopoly and that changes everything. In the current market as an OEM (of PCs at least) you pretty much *are* forced to buy from them or remain a small-time player.
Also, don't miss the Cabinet War Rooms in Whitehall (actually part of the Imperial War Museum).
Agreed, the n800 doesn't look like it will fit in your pocket but it fits in my jeans pocket just fine.
I think however that at some point you have to stand back and look at why you are trying to create a standard. The answer *ought* to be "for the good of the consumer, by way of creating a well-known benchmark, and therefore by extension the good of the industry". The second important realisation is that you achieve the most broad adoption of that standard (surely an important thing, if you are really serious about establishing the standard) by making it as easily available and implementable as you can. Imposing extra barriers such as fees and/or patents does the opposite.
Now, I'm willing to accept that standards organisations (or perhaps, their individual member organisations) don't necessarily think this way. I think they should, though.
everything open source
Are you sure this is true? Last I checked, a fair bit of the software supplied with the Maemo OS was not open source. Not to mention that a number of high profile third-party Maemo applications aren't open source either.
I have an N800, and they're great devices, but finding this out after I bought it was a great disappointment.
"More software projects have gone awry for lack of calendar time than for all other causes combined." -- Fred Brooks, Jr., _The Mythical Man Month_