Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Great. Now prove it. (Score 0) 253

"Prove what was said in the papyrus can be done" was the challenge [...] ..you are asking a different question "Prove they did it"

I said, rather explicitly

"It could possibly have been done this way" is not the same as "proved it can be done"

The papyrus said so....that's all you get from archaeology.

Yeah, I think I'll look elsewhere for insight in to archaeology. Reading doesn't seem to be your strong suit, and I doubt you could have made it through half a semester at your local community college.

Comment Re:Pffffft (Score 1) 235

I keep one in the house, one in each car, and one on my desk at work.

They're inexpensive, often less than $20, and could very well prove invaluable in an emergency.

It's the same reason you likely keep a first aid kit all of those places, like I do.

Of course, unlike the first aid kit, the hand-crank/solar radio doesn't require regular replacement. They're essentially a one-time cost. The one I have next to me is more than 10 years old and still works as well as the day I bought it. It just seems foolish not to make those a part of your normal emergency planning.

That doesn't mean you should give up your phone. After all, you can charge it with your emergency radio.

Submission + - The inexplicable case of conciousness locality and continuity (arstechnica.com) 1

Artem Tashkinov writes: Ars has published a monumental article on beaming in Star Trek and its implications, and more importantly whether it's plausible or not to beam consciousness without killing us in the process. It seems possible in the Star Trek universe, however currently physicists find the idea absurd and unreal because there's no way you can transport matter and its quantum state without first destroying it and then recreating it perfectly due to Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle. The biggest conundrum of all is the fact that pretty much everyone understands that conciousness is a physical state of the brain, which features continuity as its primary principle, yet it surely seems like copying the said state produces a new person altogether which brings the problem of conciousness becoming local to one's skull and inseparable from gray matter which sounds a bit unscientific because it introduces the notion that there's something about our brain which cannot be described in terms of physics, almost like soul. This also brings another very difficult question: how do we know if we are the same person when we wake up in the morning or after we were put under during general anaesthesia?

What do slashdotters think about all of that?

Comment Re:This! (Score 1) 306

Hence, my claim that you are glorifying drugs is correct

You seem to think that's a bad thing. Why?

Perhaps you can read up on the definition and meaning of "Spiritual" while brushing up on basic logic.

Fun fact: I've never seen anyone who goes on and on about "logical fallacies" who has any background in logic. (Though many who are under the mistaken impression that they do! Like programmers who fancy themselves mathematicians, it's just self-delusion.)

Comment Re:MECH WARRIOR (Score 1) 56

Google "EEG computer mouse" or "Star Wars Force Trainer". If you can't stand Google, find anyone with an EE undergrad degree. Chances are, they or one of their former classmates has done something similar.

Yes, this technology is with us today, and has been with us for ages.

No, it's not reading your mind. That's just what marketing wants you to believe.

Slashdot Top Deals

I judge a religion as being good or bad based on whether its adherents become better people as a result of practicing it. - Joe Mullally, computer salesman

Working...