Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:A link between DPR and an early Bitcoiner (Score 4, Insightful) 172

Regardless if there was an official link, it is probably true that Bitcoin really took off when illegal/quasi-legal enterprises like Silk Road started using them. That's not to say Silk Road created Bitcoin or that all Bitcoin commerce is illegal, just that it would never have grown to real prominence without it.

Comment Re:WWW (Score 1) 406

The government of Switzerland may disagree that Geneva is an international city. Cosmopolitan might be the world you are looking for.

Also, it wasn't the web that prevented closed-garden internets, but rather universities. Until the mid 1990s, nearly everyone on the Internet (on any protocol) was at a university or research institute (like CERN). The universities weren't trying to make a profit, so they embraced an open architecture. It was US dominated, because then as now, most large research universities are in the US. Then, mainly US companies took that university network and popularized it. So, it's very much the fault of the US university system that the internet is so open.

Comment ISS (Score 1) 85

This sounds like a perfect experiment for ISS. They mainly do biological experiments (it's not really a good platform for anything else), and this could be a neat result. CASIS (the ISS science institute) is always looking for new experiments and experimenters for the station.

Comment Re:Contribute it To Mainline (Score 1) 510

They probably will, as it benefits the ecosystem (i.e. chips designed to a kernel, kernel designed for a chip). Like Android and ChromeOS, though, patches will be slower than ideal, but still there. Google does it because they are in the long game and have an interest in keeping Linux current. It sounds like Valve are thinking the same thing.

And I run Arch for a reason too, on an Arm Chromebook with Google's kernel patches.

Comment Re:Compelling evidence (Score 0) 417

'Cause y'know [b]Greenpeace[/b] are *totally* unbiased and *totally* free of preconceived political options.

There was a time when environmental organisations actually cared about science. Nowadays, they just blindly campaign against fossil fuels (and nuclear) and ignore any connections between their claims and actual science. Especially when there are things caused by human impacts other than greenhouse gases, like an area flooding because half of it is covered in parking lots, but knee-jerk "environmental activists" claiming it is due to climate change, despite have not actaul rigous scientific evidence.

Science is hard. Conspiracy theories and political defamation is easy. Thus Greenpeace and their ilk tend to favor that later...

Comment Re:Hope one of those megaprojects is to clean the (Score 1) 142

Well probably the Russians.

For its bluster, the PLA is better thought of as a large, poorly manged investment company that happens to also have (poorly trained) soldiers and fighter jets. It hasn't really fought a war since 1949, and has very little anti-missile capability. The Russians would not give two chits about launching all the ICBMs at China if the PLA ever invaded.

Comment Re: STEM or VISA? (Score 2) 284

That's the problem with grouping science and engineering together. A shortage of engineering jobs means the market is saturated. A shortage of science jobs means that Congress and the President cut the science budget again. The two are not nessisarily related.

Slashdot Top Deals

"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe

Working...