Comment Re:Finally (Score 1) 112
Gun nerds don't have any idea what that means. You're making mistake that IT nerds are the only nerds there are.
Gun nerds don't have any idea what that means. You're making mistake that IT nerds are the only nerds there are.
You can just use Wi-Fi and a VPN tunnel on your phone. No need for separate device. Logging in can be done via biometrics, another long solved problem.
>Until it spits at you, of course.
What if you fill it with perfume instead?
Not in this config, active time is less than an hour and fuel tank it comes with is tiny.
Rifle and shotgun will almost certainly have a different pattern of felt recoil (timing of recoil impacting the carrier and force of recoil impacting the carrier) resulting in more difficult recoil control rather than easier one.
You sure you're responding to the right person?
Funny that to you, "Israel" and "Jews" are synonymous. As if all Jewish people unconditionally support all actions of the state of Israel, even those which are highly controversial within Israel itself.
This false synonymy creates an extremely harmful backlash. Stop doing it.
Ukraine is not free
Give me a list of Ukrainian prime ministers since 2000, and compare it to a list of Russian presidents since 2000 . Thanks in advance.
Even before the conflict it was the poorest and most corrupt country in Europe
This is not even remotely true. Ukraine's Rule of Law Index in 2022 was 0,50; contrast with NATO members Turkey at 0,42 and Hungary at 0,52. And its scores were dragged down by the consequences of the war in Donbas.
with a military second in size in Europe only to Russia (hence the poverty)
Ukraine's percentage of GDP spent before the current invasion was 3,2%, and that was *with* the ongoing Donbas conflict . By contrast, the US, at peace, spends 3,45% of its GDP on the military. For some European contrasts:
Azerbaijan: 4,5%
Armenia: 4,3%
Russia: 4%
Greece: 3,7%
Before the 2014 Russian invasion, Ukraine's percentage of GDP spent on the military was 1,6%.
ED: Just saw your second paragraph. But the things you speculate on are not exactly common on Titan, if they even exist on the surface at all (it's an icy crust
And no, there doesn't seem to be meaningful amounts of nitrates in the atmosphere at least. You can see a list here. Nitrogen compounds are cyanide and nitrile compounds.
Metabolized with what oxidizer?
It's just the opposite - methane on Titan is like nitrogen on Earth; it's things like acetylene and free hydrogen that are the potential energy sources, and to a lesser extent the more common (but less reactive) higher mass alkanes, etc.
The main problem is that LAWKI isn't even remotely compatible with existing in the cryogenic environment of Titan. There are a lot of interesting alternative chemistries, but they require basically redesigning life from scratch. We're simply not up to this task with our current technology.
Sadly it's being launched to near the equator, not the poles
Freedom is great and neglectable, until you very suddenly don't have it.
History has not ended. The world order that makes life nice and comfy for you is not a given into the future.
It's funny how we so strongly disagree further down in the comments, but I 100% agree with you here.
0,38g being largely fine for health is... I mean, if I had to bet, I'd put my money on it probably being true, but it's anything but guaranteed. There was a private project to test this, the Mars Gravity Biosatellite, but it ran out of funding; I'm not aware of any similar experiments that have been conducted. There've been a variety of attempts to simulate various gravity on Earth, such as having people lie on tilted beds or hanging them from cranes at an angle or whatnot, but they all have obvious weaknesses.
There's not just the question of adults who visit from Earth, but also children who grow up on 0,38g, and what impact that would have to their physiology.
Venus is hot, but it's not *that* hot...
NASA is getting there
It most definitely is not. Are you being deliberately obtuse?
one can do for more than a few minutes before shit implodes and burns
You clearly didn't read anything I wrote, so why should I even bother responding? (A) Literally nobody was talking about settling the surface, and (B) It's been repeatedly pointed out that basically indefinite lifespans can be achieved for surface vehicles, as backed up by peer-reviewed research from NASA. And "christoban on Slashdot disagrees with peer-reviewed research from NASA" isn't exactly a compelling argument.
B) building floating cities, which would probably take another century of engineering and investment before we could do so reliably.
We were flying balloons on Venus almost 40 years before we flew a helicopter on Mars. We directly sampled Venus's atmosphere 4 years before we sampled Mars. We successfully landed and transmitted data either 1 or 6 years (depending on your definition) from the surface of Venus vs. Mars.
Your incredulity about levels of difficulty doesn't translate to actual levels of difficulty.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?