Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Completely Absurd (Score 1) 249

And I personally consider it unfair that they still get federal services such as protection from the US military. But US territories have so few people and are so poor that it doesn't really matter, except for the principle. They are effectively colonies of the United States.

Agreed, I think we should pay federal taxes. The problem is the whole "taxation without representation", DC pays federal taxes but doesn't get represented. DC senator is as useless as ours (I live in PR). In our case we have no federal taxes but we can't vote for president we have no senators or house representatives. We would need statehood for that, most people in PR want that but I don't think it will happen. Our government is corrupt/stupid (but I guess we are not the only ones the US has its share of corrupt/stupid politicians), people fight over ideologies (you have the same problem) and I'm sure your politicians don't want to dilute their power by adding a lot of extra people to congress.

The notable exception (for population count at least) is Puerto Rico.

Yeah, our population is 3 million, we are the 34 highest populated state/territory in the US. Higher than Mississipi, Kansas, New Mexico and Nebraska.

Not sure exactly what the deal is, but surely removing the federal tax from DC citizens would make it, unfairly, a tax haven. Why live in Maryland if you save a lot by moving a mile away to DC? It seems to me it would create a lot of problems, like raise housing costs in DC.

Removing federal tax is stupid. DC Is basically a state but like with PR politicians will shelve this because they don't want to dilute their power. Republicans don't want to add a few more democrats to the house.

Comment Re:Completely Absurd (Score 1) 249

Not true. The only time statehood lost in recent years was on 1998 , and it lost to the idiotic "None of the Above" options.

Referendum 1967: 39% statehood, (67% commonwealth, independence 0.6%)
Referendum 1998: 46% statehood (50% None of the above, 2.6% independence 2.6%, 0.3% free association, 0% commonwealth)
Referendum 2012: 61% statehood (independence 5%, free association 33%, commonwealth 0%)
Referendum 2017: 97% statehood (independence 1.50%, commonwealth 1.32%)

Comment Re:Why not Puerto Rico? (Score 1) 249

Exactly. Not only that, you will also get everyone here in PR (people+companies) paying federal taxes. Anyway I'm sick of companies (I'm looking at you Dell/Google) not selling/giving services here because we are not part of the US. We are part of the US to enlist and fight in wars, but not to get a fucking Alienware PC shipped down here. Not even shipping to the US and paying with an AMEX because the billing address is in PR. Fucking Dell.

Comment Re: Here we go again (Score 2) 111

You are right on most things except the "residents keep voting to keep the status quo" part. There have been like 2 (maybe 3) referendums about status. Statehood won all of them. Unfortunately congress has to validate (sponsor?) the referendum or is not valid, so those are just symbolic votes. We should be paying federal taxes but that would mean we should get senators/house representatives. I'm sure many senators don't want to dilute their power adding more people in the mix. Specially morons like our politicians, even though congress is not devoid of morons.

Comment Well depends on the situation... (Score 1) 181

... sometimes I like to do something unbelievably inefficient. Not for production code though.

In college a teacher gave us an assignment to reverse a linked list. I made it recursive. My teacher said: "It's inefficient and that will only works with small lists, you will get a stack overflow". I said "Who cares, it is pretty", Still got an A.

Comment Re:Best comment today! Law allows it for non-profi (Score 1) 156

The parent post is very informative, but won't be seen by a lot of people because it's AC and doesn't have its own subject line.

Quoting the AC:

17 USC 111(a): "Certain Exempted. The secondary transmission of a performance or display of a work embodied in a primary transmission is not an infringement of copyright if... the secondary transmission is not made by a cable system but is made by a governmental body, or other nonprofit organization, without any purpose of direct or indirect commercial advantage, and without charge to the recipients of the secondary transmission other than assessments necessary to defray the actual and reasonable costs of maintaining and operating the secondary transmission service."

So the law is re-transmitting the broadcast is okay if it's done by a non-profit.

Note this is only about re-transmitting *broadcast* TV, which was already being sent out to everyone for free.

So, a non-profit,in theory, could deliver broadcast TV only charging for the maintenance of the antennas/servers/internet used for delivery? Interesting...

Comment Re:I was furious at Gates and IBM (Score 1) 418

Did you ever try to add a hard disk to an Amiga?

No.

It was a nightmare, it just wasn't designed for it.

IBM PC's were.

I had an A2000 and it was simple. I bought a GVP board and a SCSI drive with a ton of space (120MB). It wasn't that hard. I did it myself and all I had worked with before was a C64. I still have that Amiga although the 1084S is acting weird.

Comment Re:Medical devices with Windows 7? (Score 1) 233

At work we have 3 Spectrometers with integrated computers. One uses MSDOS with a PATA drive and a floppy. A pain when the HD dies, have one of those flash drive->floppy drives ready for when it breaks (not touching it if its working). Another with a weird Windows 2000 Embedded that it's impossible to find, and another with XP. They are too specialized and only upgraded by the company. Also new ones go for 100k or something, so unless they blow up they stay as they are.

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...