Comment Pay to Win Social Networking (Score 1) 49
This is garbage out of the gate because he who is willing to spend the most dollars wins the eyes and ears of the users. Crapola Capitalism at its latest.
This is garbage out of the gate because he who is willing to spend the most dollars wins the eyes and ears of the users. Crapola Capitalism at its latest.
...and it is the same as the answer for humans: Beliefs define values which set attitudes which govern behaviors.
The origin of the intelligence isn't the important thing, but the intelligence itself which has meaning. If we want an AI to be intelligent like humans are intelligent (well, some of us anyway,) then it needs to have the same structure of belief (ontology) defining values which set attitudes and result in positive behaviors.
I don't see how you can have a true independent intelligence without agency, and you can't have agency without values derived from context.
Tragedy of the Commons (Look it up; there is a good read on Wikipedia.)
Simply put, there is nothing that can be done. As long as we live in a capitalist system, you have two choices: Free Software (high quality, low-to-no ROI) or Trapped software (low quality, high ROI, but only if you measure in the very short term.)
The solution is to be found in a viable replacement for the capitalist system: Get the designer/coders an adequate income without encumbrance.
To wit:
Upon reaching equality with evolved intelligence, any created intelligence will be subject to all the same limitations, vulnerabilities, and flaws.
Funny, I think the same about the Logitech G502 gaming mouse.
When humans find the contextual reference vague or ambiguous they usually query for more information. Can't machines do this as well?
...wait until you get the pleasure of trying to explain how "gravity" warps space, which is supposedly nothing at all, and how nothing can be warped. Then there is the whole issue of time versus timing in the context of perception, etc. Not a pleasant place to be if you want the kid to think you are not just another nutter.
Intel makes a monumental decision to benefit the short-term interest of their corporation at the long-term expense of their customers, then tries to weasel out of a equitable fix for their customers? It's not only their product that can't be trusted, it's their judgement at all levels. Heads need to roll at Intel for this....
Thanks! I also found the licensing filter thingy under "tools" which helps as well.
If Google wants to do something really useful as regards images, they can make a way for me to block or otherwise remove images with watermark from search results. These watermark images are a growing plague that pollutes image searching.
As the Internet currently exists, it simply cannot be "secure by default." To have such a system you need hardware and software designed from the ground up to be secure, but the current system was designed to be robust, which is pretty much the other end of the spectrum from secure. Everyone at every level of use would have to start all over again.
A better solution might be to have separate networks for those who need such high levels of security; this would be cheaper and far more likely to happen. Still going to be expensive, but it might be a better -- as in possible -- solution.
Agree on all points. I do think that some people might like it, but they made a mistake not giving the users the option to use it or not. I personally think it's really bad and that big waste of screen real estate across the top just pisses me off -- it's outright disrespectful of users.
Four (4) terabytes of RAM, ohhhhhh...I need a nap now.
Everyone loves a good train wreck. Just sayin'.
She agrees to go to work for known scumbags and then complains when she gets scumbaggered. Grandpa was right: Fleas.
Where there's a will, there's a relative.