And what's this have to do with sinij's original point?
I thought it was obvious - selective application of justice. Now, don't go pulling fire alarms anymore.
Which non-violent political protesters were jailed? Surely you can't be referring to the January 6th rioters, who tresspassed in the capitol building, vandalized it, and assaulted the capitol police? All three acts are clearly illegal under any rational reading of the law.
Every single one of them did all these things?
For example, Biden's justice department manufacturing novel legal theories [nytimes.com] to imprison non-violent political protesters...
Amazon can afford...
This is not a valid argument of EV economic feasibility. Additionally, your reflexive urge to spend other people's money is hilarious.
EVs cost a lot less than fossils to maintain.
The Nissan Leaf is a good example
Clearly EVs are the future and the savings will be every year, for the foreseeable future.
If we look at the electricity costs alone, why are you so certain it will remain low when generation is down, regulatory costs are up, and demand is up?
That aside, maintenance costs of EVs are proven to be higher than ICE. The promise of simpler electric cars did not materialize, EVs on the road today are differently complex than ICEs only the technology is newer. So no, it is not clear to me that EVs will be cheaper to run on individual or fleet scale.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?