That's not really true about InDesign being a carbon copy of PageMaker. InDesign is a lot more like QuarkXPress and Illustrator got caught in a Star Trek-style transporter accident where their DNA was merged and a single entity materialized on the transporter pad. InDesign was specifically engineered to compete with Quark - since they were discontinuing PageMaker - so it had to be somewhat approachable for Quark users.
Odd, then, how gay/trans/queer/etc people in literature are – over and over and over – identified as not age-appropriate. It's almost like this is intentional.
Your numbers are wrong on their face. Worldwide, a wide range of studies have consistently shown much higher numbers:
I don't think there's any CarPlay/Android Auto system out there that doesn't include all the regular stuff (FM, Sirius, etc) so don't worry about it. ðY
One of the primary considerations when I bought my last car was whether it supported Apple's CarPlay. I didn't even consider a car without it – and the GM/Chevrolet Bolt was a Final Two contender (I went with a Kia). I love the integrated functionality and will not buy a car without it in the future.
GM's decision here is blatantly anti-consumer and sales will suffer, and that's good. They apparently need to learn this lesson.
Holy cow, that's utterly draconian. Is this a publically-well-hated company that you can tell us about?
The point is that they use the moon shot a LOT in their advertising, and it is not representative of what the phone is capable of doing. For example, if you tried to take a pic of some similarly-distant (or small on the sensor) object, you won't get the results the moon pics appear to promise. Essentially, Samsung has special-cased the moon by including a very detailed picture of it in the algorithm – they didn't include pictures of, say, the Eiffel Tower or the Statue of Liberty, and a picture taken from a great distance of them is still going to be a smear of interpolated goop instead of the crystal-clear quality promised in the ads.
They *are* heavy, but they're also not the problem.
By any chance was this the Cue Cat?
You don't think mRNA is technology?
OMG that's genius, and also works in the voice of George.
Seinfeld was actually filmed before a live audience (for indoor scenes, anyhow). Although the audience reaction is altered by the fact of having to edit together multiple takes of a scene into the final product, the reactions are for the most part genuine.
Adobe switched their focus to PDF more than 20 years ago and considers PostScript a bit of a dead technology. I program in PS and I've never met another soul who was doing the same.
I'm curious - what do you need the additional precision for?
Adobe's Postscript implementation (at least, the modern one) is still the reference implementation. If you look through the Ghostscript bug database, you'll find a lot of references to "Distiller does it this way and Ghostscript doesn't".
Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky
