Stupid fuckers could have made the protocols interactive, but no, they had to try to be clever and redesign the whole thing, so we will need to run dual stack for 5-10 years. No bugs gonna be there. They were just pissy because no one liked OSI CLNS . Which would be just as easy to switch over to, by the way. How many addressable addresses does IPX/SPX have? Lets Dual stack that instead, just to fuck them.

My only bitter pleasure will be watching microsoft networking melt down. Dynamic DNS? No way bitch, ip6 addresses handed out by the router. Of course they will just continue to cheat and use NetBui with a local global catolauge server, like they do now.

Well, some devices have support for a /31 subnet, that helps a bit. But the problem is usually that the way the cable head end infrasructure works, you are on a shared network, and they roll out a subnet for static ip addresses keyed to mac addresses. So if you are the only static subnet user in the neightborhood, then some addresses are wasted.

The first set of idiots wrong out of the tech sector will be IPv6 early adopters. When the core routers start rebooting because of IPv6 ospf bugs, and layer 2 switches turn out to use silicon shortcuts that depend on ipv4 ethertypes and shit does not work, have fun troubleshooting dynamic address assignment and dns via hostnames.

The IPv6 adoption is still 2 years off, and Fusion power is 30 years off.

What is the needless hardware and Software involved with NAT? Firewalls and load balances are still in place. Firewalls usually need static statements even if you don't NAT.

Having merged many an organization with overlapping private space, I sure do wish that they had just rolled out IPv6 by doing nothing other than doubling the address space and making ipv4 and ipv6 connections seamless. But they got clever, and we need to wait untill a bunch of suckers roll out ipv6 and hit all the career ending outages and bugs.

Entertainment value or sanity..... I mean sh just keeps bringing the comedy nuggets, as she is the anti-masturbation candidate.

If Cameron dies at the bottom of the ocean, by definition, it will be BEFORE he makes avatar II. Just saying is all.

Highlander 3 wasn't THAT bad. I am convinced, however, that whoever wrote the second one didn't watch the first one.

It's the only way to be sure.

Make an announcement that all wireless data use is considered cheating, even accidental use. Airplane mode is in effect.

Proctors walk around with these.

http://www.google.com/products/catalog?hl=en&expIds=25657,25856,25907,25980,26512&sugexp=ldymls&tok=_RMmTa4s-9-O-d34ExuZRg&xhr=t&q=cell+phone+detector&cp=15&rlz=1B7GGLL_enUS380US380&um=1&ie=UTF-8&cid=18443697480885658075&ei=6WyUTMzhNIP-8Aa56PWMDA&sa=X&oi=product_catalog_result&ct=result&resnum=2&sqi=2&ved=0CC4Q8wIwAQ#

We are right on schedule, heading in to tech level 8.

Are they spying on me if they read it and make judgments about my intelligence thereby?

But it takes a certain number of people to start making it useful.

This is the point of the application. Holy crap, where does the spying come in. Posting on Chatter is like sending an email to everyone in the company, and everyone KNOWS this.

Yes except the restaurant is paid for the company, an it is called "Place to talk about work and make suggestions and brainstorm publicly." And when they hear the conversations they give you a big raise.

THANK YOU. The tone of this article is ridiculous. Just imagine it is an internal company wiki without anonymous accounts. Would it be bad somehow to reward someone who performs his job well?