I see. So that's the reason why they only ask some questions.
As in: "We've got credible information about pending terrorist attacks, but let's not upset the people too much with scanners.
Let's keep that for later, when they are more used to our appearance in the public.
In the mean time, let's just wait for 'the terrorists' to succeed.

Yeah right, as if that is adding to security.

Actually, 'TSA' stands for:
The SA...

If it's coming from you, then you know where you can stick it :)

I'm afraid this time it will be a worldwide co-ordinated fascist attack on all our freedoms.

Geez, what a 'friends' one can make on facebook.com.
Not my venue...

Which not necessarily means that he got it right this time.

The tests that I have seen, say that GMO in the long run is detrimental to our health.

... and what exactly does this have to do with GMO?
And how many lives did his technology cost in terms of diseases through the soil exhaustion, hence reduced nutrient content in food?

... are more the result of the introduction of hybrid vs. the native varieties.
The fact that the big agricultural corporations preferred to introduce GMO hybrids, more than non-GMO hybrids, and push them relentlessly through bribery, does not make the increased production a result of GMO 'an sich'.

As long as there is no conclusive science telling us where all the 'modern' diseases (cancer, cardiovascular, diabetes) are coming from, to me the correlation with the introduction of processed and chemically grown, and even GMO, foods is too strong to state that the choice to fear GMO's (and processed food) is 'superstitious'.

That's why my opinion is that everyone has the right to choose for 'organic' food, and to demand also labeling of the same.

That's a lot of unproven statements in 3 sentences...

Why, is 'defending' China 'unpatriotic'?

That's the work-around they've found around democracy (first, and then) freedom, and they are applying it now, going full-throttle.

Good one. One I didn't dare to propose because I have no shred of any evidence.
Swiss bank accounts maybe?
(Or bitcoins, anonymously generated over TOR?)

As pointed out above, it was the board that was already decided at ditching the previous CEO and hiring Elop/MS instead.
Now, as Dilbert has pointed out, this was a strategic move of sheer genius, with which MS has realised three very strategic goals:
1. Windows phone introduced in the market,
2. Nokia, the biggest competitor for their own phone hardware sales ambitions has been crushed,
3. Linux as OS for the mobile phone has been disabled.
Luckily, there is still the Jolla (currently connection time out) initiative with Tizen.

The grand question: How did the Nokia board get played up so much by Microsoft?