You continue to make the assumption that he had no backup plan, and you offer (perhaps understandably, as you're not inside his head) no supporting evidence aside from statements on his part that any sane person would make, regardless of the truth of those statements. I've known a couple of guys who got in some trouble and had seven figures to lose, and be assured they both had contingency plans despite their pleas to the contrary. You aren't privy to his personal network of relationships; stop pretending you are. You shouldn't assume getting burned by one employee equates to never "hiring" again. I was once burned to the tune of USD $40K by an employee, which was not a small sum of money for me. I didn't stop hiring, but I did get smarter about it.

Aside from a fundamental misunderstanding of how scenarios on this level typically play out (they don't actually care about his money; they care much more about who he can help them grab to further pad their resumes), you make the mistake of assuming he'll be convicted and sentenced to anything more than a decade in prison. Conviction is uncertain, anything more than ten years is unlikely. Most men can do ten years with the knowledge that they have a fortune waiting on the other side, as long as they're smart about how they conduct themselves following release. Again, he wouldn't be the first guy to play it smart in this regard.

Once again, the people prosecuting him don't give two shits about Bitcoin. Think about that for a while.

Fair enough :). For the record, I've seen some pretty bizarre (read: wtf) stuff done in Python, Java, and certainly C. While I happen to greatly prefer Perl for various tasks, I'm also a big fan of coding to a style guide, whether adopted from an external source or developed internally, regardless of the language being used. I'm with you on context and structure.

When referring to the Perl programming language, the correct usage is Perl. Given the fact that you're apparently in a position to make hiring decisions on programmer positions, you would be well advised to be well versed in proper naming conventions. Incidentally, I've been coding in multiple languages, although predominantly in Perl, for twenty years. I'm not looking for a job, though.

You're cute. Good luck seizing encrypted material that's probably replicated to fifteen servers in fifteen countries, while the servers themselves are unknown to you. Have fun, champ.

He'll probably just let the process play out with his public defender, aiming for the lowest legal penalty possible, and promptly leave the country for a non-extraditing locale at the first opportunity. Then he'll able to recover his funds and go about his life, more or less as he wishes. There's virtually no chance of those funds being recovered by the authorities; I'd be very surprised to learn that the BTC in question are still in the wallet in question even now. Setting up contingency plans for transfers and further action, based anywhere on the planet, are simply too simple a concept to have been overlooked.

I believe you lack adequate information on how Bitcoin works. If he or someone he trusts and gave instructions to beforehand has access to another copy of the wallet, it's just as good as the original, and the coins may be transferred elsewhere and converted to other currencies, etc via the normal exchanges. I'll be surprised if the prosecuting authorities manage to figure out how to track that; they certainly won't be able to stop it. If by some chance they manage to gain access to the encrypted keys that protect the wallet in their possession, it almost certainly won't be of any value (to them) by then.

I don't get pissed off at public records being made available to the public. I get pissed off at unreasonable legal requirements that lead to things being entered into the public record in the first place, and I fully support every individual's right to make his/her own decision on whether their ownership and use of firearms should be a matter of public record or not.

People who follow the law in this case wind up unreasonably burdened and subject to information disclosure beyond their control. People who do not follow the law aren't burdened by it, and do as they like without the mere existence of the laws or threats of prison sentences doing anything to stop them from committing violent acts. Put simply: neither nanny state mentalities nor "tough on crime" policies actually work very well. See how this works?

Do you support privacy rights? I certainly do, and I support equality as well, meaning I don't pick and choose which citizens deserve privacy and which don't.

For the record, if you're planning on creating your own app to show who owns firearms, you can add me as your first entry. I gladly volunteer this information; kindly respect the privacy of others until you're told otherwise. Have a nice day, champ.

I'm happy to broadcast it, despite the risks associated with such a broadcast. I'll gladly support anyone subjected to illegal seizure by any means necessary, and for those who would attempt an amateur grab: try it.

This is why I place high value on firearms, ammunition, and basic supplies. I'm not exactly a "prepper" but I'm certainly not a fool, either. Bad times can happen any time, and people who understand how to find food and water stand a better chance of dealing with circumstances than those who don't.

I have two daughters, a son on the way, and barring mass extinction of wildlife I'll be able to feed the family. The other unfortunate complications of a true economic collapse are factors I'd rather not consider in depth unless I have to.

On second thought, I hear Diebold is hiring, so maybe you'll be elected after all.

Bobby, you're never going to be president if you keep up with these shenanigans.

By cherry picking two sentences out of my previous reply, you managed to miss the entire point of the reply in its entirety. You've also handily proven that point.

I'm waiting for the GP to respond with something along the lines of "blah blah you wasted your vote blah blah you acted as a spoiler" ... and when millions of people think that way, there's no chance of any third party candidate gaining any traction. The real problem here are apathy, excuses, and herd mentality. People don't vote on issues, hell they hardly understand what issues are at stake with any particular candidate. On the whole, people tend to vote for the political equivalent of their favorite sports team. So we get what we get, which is a horrible mess.

I have no idea how to to fix this, aside from watching things get so bad that people are rioting in the streets in every major city in the nation, and subsequently saying something like "well now, now that you all seem to care about what's happening since you can no longer ignore its direct effect on a massive number of peoples' lives, your own included, how about we figure this out."

What you're describing would truly be boring. I guess you need AjaxTerm; knock yourself out.

I'll freely admit to the possibility that my dominant visual processing scheme includes automation rejection of unsuitable posteriors :)