Comment Re:Stupid comment... (Score 1) 154
Getting dropped by the lable is usualy a godsend, a disaster is having a multi-record exclusive contract and tje label will not produce your last record.
Getting dropped by the lable is usualy a godsend, a disaster is having a multi-record exclusive contract and tje label will not produce your last record.
Only newbie even see the issues he's complaining about.
My understanding is the reactors that are causing the problems were actually scheduled to be decommissioned 3 months after the earthquake happened, more like rotten luck than incompetance.
I agree, and the states Governor should nominate the Senators for confirmation by the state legislaters; please not my sig.
That depends on how you define is.
You mean like the constitution of the USA, which president Bush openly condemned as just a piece of paper?
Yup it's just a piece of paper as long as the people who have sworn to protect and defend it agains all enemies forgien and domestic don't.
Bleeding the USG dry by Using up the finacial resources is futile; if you want to grab them by the balls, repeal the Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
If they crack the files, they gain the encryption key. Now they can search the traffic and see who recieved the key, after that SEAL team 6 gets lots of excercise.
What your calling "abuse" is pretty much the rest of Manning's life now. His brain still has classified information in it, just talking to Manning is a danger to those around him.
Go ahead and try to put health data into Excel without violating HIPPAA and going to jail.
Why would putting health data into a spreadsheet violate HIPPA? If the computer is secure HIPPA is happy.
The same medical procedure can be billed at hundreds of different rates, depending on numerous criteria, many of which are covered by privacy laws, or are calculated by third party labs or testing facilities.
Nobody cares how much the providers charge, the insurers pay the UCF, Usual and Customary Fee, that is what counts.
The UCF is the average of what healthcare providers of similar skills in a geographic area bill the insurers. Most healthcare providers bill for an amount that is over what they'll willingly settle for.
If you really think this is easy, then you don't have a clue. There is a reason that we spend 2 trillion a year on health care, and if you compare America's longevity, infant mortality, etc. to other countries, it is pretty obvious that all that money isn't being spent on actual effective medicine.
Lawyers and insurance company siphon off a fair share, if you can figure out a way to keep the leaches out of the malpractice litigations without freezing out the legitimately wronged, the country would be grateful.
It's pretty easy for a billing system to say "You haven't met your deductible" or "You've paid about enough"... but as I understand it, the legislation requires that each patientis cost be tracked on a per-patient basis - not per-policy or even per-insurer.
That's understandable, what I don't get is why the the limit has been waived for a year instead of instating it as a minimum of per-insurer basis; if a patient is over for an insurer, than they are that as a minimum.
Do you really think insurance executives know how to add?!?!?!?
Well since you mention it, i don't think that there is any guarantee that they do. Anyone who has dealt with third-party health benefits providers will not think this is snarky.
Obama doesn't need legal authority, he uses executive orders now.
I don't think so, Governments use Tor for sensitive communications, if they banned Tor for civilians then only Governments would be using it. If you want to hide a tree, you hide it in a forest, not the middle of a wheat field!
Well they changed the name didn't they, so its not exactly the Tor Bundle.
"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne