If you think Russia will try and invade a European Union that holds a good arsenal of nuclear warheads, you are living in a fantasy land.

It's a third world country tactic. Just like the name of any third world country is the exact opposite of what it is, like the "Democratic People's Republic of Korea".

Or the "Patriot Act"

So will anyone complain about the US targeting European companies for cash, or is that only allowed when it's the EU that does it?

... for a phone plan. I'm currently paying 15€ and it covers all my needs exitensively. I would seriously consider moving to a different country if businesses were allowed to screw me over that big on a regular basis. If one business is allowed to, you know they all do.

I guess you were wrong.

I never understood how people could easily fall for the obvious misinformation that Trump was Putin's favourite and Clinton somehow hated him. You didn't actually listen to him and believed him, did you? Clinton is the one who has a very cosy relationship with Putin and is only publicly puting up a front.

Every Chinese peerson I knew all used qunar and ctrip was for foreigners who wanted to book trips to/from China. Outside of China I've always used Skyscanner with great content. I keep being amazed at how a simple website who just links you to other websites can be have so much value.

I am somewhat disturbed by the lack of imagination my fellow /. readers have shown. It's not that difficult to think that within our lifetime, say in the next 50 years, we will have something that resembles paper but is in fact digital. It will be able to display any image or text transmitted to it either by sliding it through something or even wirelessly. It will not be a screen, thus require light to view it and it won't consume energy on a constant basis. One could edit it with the use of special pens.

I don't think the parent is a Trump supporter. Try reading it again.

So explain to me on this newsday how Brexit was necessairy due to evil EU and oh so democratic British parlament? All I keep hearing is the EU being genuinely concerned about it's citizen well being and privacy, perhaps sometimes making small mistakes but always with the best of intentions. In the meanwhile the UK is using 1984 as a guidebook.

And what enemy exactly would be deterred by any number of tomahawk missiles that isn't already deterred by a single nuclear bomb?

So how much safer would you say are the British after having further antagonized religious extremists by killing innocent people in their country with absolutely no provocation or threat towards you?

Or you know, you don't go about invading other countries killing innocent people and inspire hatred of you around the world so no one feels the need to terrorize you. Or do you still think they hate you because you're so free? PS: Guess what the objective of terrorists is? To terrorize you. That's right, you just made them win by being terrorized into passing draconion Orwellian laws.

after your privacy and defends it. But hey, at least they took back control!

I find it quite hilarious how you try to portray Gary Johnson as a "selfish prick" especially in comparison to both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Have you even seen any of his interviews? He is incredibly humble, owes up to his own mistakes more than he even has to, exhibits nothing but honesty so much that he gets critisized for it.