Comment Re:Prof is a compleat idiot (Score 1) 693
Totally agree, apart from the beating to death bit!
Totally agree, apart from the beating to death bit!
C'mon gman003. You can watch the whole video, surely, before posting?
The heating effect is important here too.
While on the subject of CSI, don't you love the way they just happen to have a custom spinny-roundy 3D database for just about anything you can care to think of.
That, and the rather optimistic natural language queries they type into the aforementioned databases.
Well personally I'd wait and see if they "do no evil" with regard to their blatantly obvious software patent for using geolocation info to target ads.
think he means bibtex (a LaTeX bibliography tool/format)
I switched from MS Excel to OOcalc for some analysis I'm doing at the moment. Excel was slow, made huge files and the bar charts were hideously shaded by default.
We really need a video of the shared "retina" thing, which is of course not in the original critterding video. However, this sounds cool enough for me to try it at home later.
On second thoughts, maybe they didn't want to "produce hallucinations" in millions of Slashdotters...
Thanks for the comments. I'll take them one by one (while I wait for the algorithm to tick over to 250 generations).
1. to give a fair comparison with the hand-picked better sounding loops given in all the subsequent "tasters", the time=zero loops are also hand-picked. Rest assured that most of them sounded pretty horrific. Yes we did set a minimum amount of complexity (I think it was at least 8 different "tracks") in the initial Adam and Eve, but then let them evolve under no selection for a long time.
2. yes we have to keep it short so that rating can happen in this lifetime
3. there are no constraints on harmonies or anything, however the "palette" of notes is defined once (all evolved from random) and then the notes are picked from the palette. Mutations to the palette are going to be rare (because defining it takes many fewer "genes" than defining all the music) - hence the good agreement between loops.
4. yep, there have been scientific studies showing herd behaviour in music "selection". The rest of what you say can't be denied, and that's what we're interested in and why we're doing the experiment.
5. no it's real - but I didn't know about the tenori-on, so thanks for the heads up on that
nearly at 250 generations now...
For the last time...
darwintunes.org has no ads at all - it's an academic experiment website, it would be inappropriate. Even my slightly more commercial evolectronica.com doesn't have ads. From my experience that would just be a colossal waste of time and turn people away.
What newscientist.com (or perhaps DNS hackers) do with their ads is nothing to do with me!
And finally, it was Slashdot who made the New Scientist link look like the main link for the article, not me! See my original submission:
http://slashdot.org/submission/1136438/Music-by-natural-selection
Some people are having problems with the New Scientist link. AardvarkCelery has some info in the post currently below this
http://entertainment.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1485740&cid=30521010
"Look! There! Evil!.. pure and simple, total evil from the Eighth Dimension!" -- Buckaroo Banzai