Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Might be right, but (Score 1) 133

No they don't. Especially when they aren't "artists", they are designers who are creating things intended to be used by other people. This isn't "art" (though some good designs may certainly qualify), it's a tool. Anyone who thinks they are the best designer is just deluding themselves. No one creates a tool in a vacuum. Not a successful tool, at least.

Comment Re:Tesla apparently doesn't understand how NTSB wo (Score 1) 160

Tesla should have a great deal less than 2 deaths under their belt to be on par with human safety levels.

That is a strong assertion from someone who says "I can't find any stats".

Human drivers kill about 15 people per billion miles.

Tesla Autopilot has driven more than 1.3 billion miles, and has killed two people. So the fatality rate is roughly a tenth that of humans. That is a lot better than "on par" with humans.

How many of that 1.3 billion miles is on populous roads though? Are they counting test track miles or only public roads? Is this self driving in the manner of a smart cruise control or truly self driving? I don't know the numbers but I find it hard to believe they truly have 1.3 billion miles of legit fully self driving miles on populated roads.

 

Comment Generally awful (Score 4, Insightful) 435

3D is a generally awful experience for most people. It's disorienting, uncomfortable, and doesn't look good for about 99% of the events that took the effort to record in 3D. It was also insanely expensive for a gimmick. It's the same gimmick that has been recurring every 20 or 30 years since the 50s. It still doesn't look any better than it did when it was first introduced. And, as has already been mentioned, having to wear glasses to watch tv sucks. For those that already wear glasses it double sucks.

Comment already known (Score 1) 80

If you have access to someone's phone, and a legitimate reason to ask, the phone company can easily give you their identity based on the phone's MEID and SIM card information. If it's a burner phone, you can still get more information about how/where it was purchased in a much shorter time than any of this information will provide about the person.

Comment Won't do anything (Score 3, Informative) 107

This won't do anything. It's not like people are only using their phones to make an outgoing calls and then turning them off. People use smart phones to DO things. Whether that's accessing the internet or communicating with people via text or voice, the phone NEEDS radio signals to do that. "Man in the middle" systems exploit that for tracking. What Snowden and Huang are recommending isn't going to change that at all.

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...