We already got a deskjob in the air travel industry, it is called air traffic control. And despite the ease of staffing it, the ease of having regular, short shifts so that staff can be available, in redundant numbers for emergencies and well rested, air traffic control is routinely understaffed and overworked.
Do you think remote pilots would be immune from the eternal pressures of cost cutting (on functional staff, never on executive wages). If one remote pilot can monitor one remote flight, why not two. of course only during the quiet times during Atlantic crossings. Soon trainees will be monitoring dozens of flights, alone because the handful of remaining trained pilots are doing non-stop landings during 12 hour shifts with no breaks. Don't like it, we can outsource you now to any corner of the planet boy so just take it.
That is to say nothing of the inevitable super center that will spring up and then power down as the 1 power cable is cut by a guy with a shovel and it turns out the backup power budget was spent on bonuses. It happened before it will happen again. And that critical infrastructure update? Delayed until the system collapse. You wouldn't think airports would delay replacing an aging radar because taking it down would close down the airport for a just a few hours, but it has happened. Now your safety no longer depends on essential but still optional equipment, your life hangs by a radio tower people can protest against for years and whose delay makes some managers budget look good.
It ain't the tech I am worried about, it is the humans. Don't believe me? COUNT the number of pilots in a UAV setup. 1 pilot. Airlines got two for a reason. Cost cutting right there.