What the hell are you talking about? Why are passphrases relevant to this discussion?

It was either ignorance or irony. Either way, +1 Funny!

HDCP is not effective protection. There are easily available hdcp-stripping devices. Those devices are illegal in some draconian regimes such as the USA, but they're still not hard to find.

On the other hand, the products have such a simple interface that fairly trivial to make an abstraction layer.

that has an atom cpu and eMMC storage. it's crap.

Malice? He did over-represent how much money he paid to the licensing board, but in order to be listened to more carefully for what he perceived to be the public good.

That's not a malicious lie. Maybe nefarious. But more likely a falsehood made out of ignorance and not even a lie. Luckily, Oregon has abolished the death penalty!

Then maybe we should change the law.

What have you done so far? Who is working on it? Who is funding it?

What people really want is for air travel to be cheaper, not faster. I think the best measure of performance of commercial airliners is revenue -- they're COMMERCIAL airliners.

You should look at military or experimental aircraft if you're interested in other performance aspects of aircraft design.

I think the worst case is that VR is only interesting for gamers. Even then, VR will "take off" and not fade away. Some gamers always seem to have money available and will always upgrade to the latest and greatest.

Digitization of small objects doesn't really seem all that problematic. I think taking multiple pictures with different colors and intensities of light could help correct for many surface types.

On the other hand, 2026 seems optimistic for capturing the real world. So much of the human brain is focused on figuring out what we're seeing that I don't think we'll be able to reduce it to a few clever algorithms.

new and delete don't generally make system calls. The system call is brk(), and it's only needed to resize the heap. The C and C++ runtimes also allocate a large heap at startup, and will only resize it when it approaches exhaustion.

Basically, the entire point of your post is lost because it is based on a misunderstanding.

I'm doing product shots. It's really astonishing. It's like I've built the transporter from Star Trek.

Anyone interested in this, and wanting good results, should check out Agisoft PhotoScan.

It's being rendered at around that rate as well.

The VR software includes some ability to shift an already rendered frame because of head tracking, the same approach could probably be used to compensate for eye motion. I'm not sure how much an eye really moves in 1/60th of a second. It also has a micro-stutter that is probably fairly unpredictable. Gross motor movement takes a while to start and stop, so the viewport of the next frame can generally be calculated with reasonable accuracy.