Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Poor management (Score 1) 423

Around the time I left they had started putting part in "bins". And they started sending in secret shoppers. If an employee didn't ask every customer about a cell phone AND a satellite dish they were fired. Even before that turnover was like a fast food place.

They resented their employees worse than a fast food place. My thoughts is that management had to blame someone for their poor sales, and as they say crap rolls downhill. So it was the poor lackey at the bottom to catch it. Employees were probably blamed for stealing when it was shoplifters that could not be stopped. That kind of nonsense.

Comment Re:No place for 'almost', 'not quite' and 'nearly' (Score 1) 423

Also lots of Arduino stuff.

If it would have been the Radio Shack of old, they would have been the ones to invent the Arduino But they're not. All they are now is a bunch of stuffy managers making a death bed repentance.

Everything you mentioned can now be found online for cheaper, and everybody is now used to getting it that way and probably prefers not having to drive to the store and having it delivered to the doorstep anyway.

Amazon will probably be able to pick up the slack with same day shipping in the near future for a lot of these items. But even then I don't mind waiting two or three for the USPS.

Comment Re:two words (Score 1) 423

I disagree. Other places now sell batteries quite inexpensively, like Harbor Freight where you can find numerous button cells imexpensively blister packed (a lot cheaper than Radio Shack sells them). Along with a whole aisle of electrical supplies and nuts and bolts. Radio Shack was arrogant in thinking they could continue to charge exorbitant prices for these.

Other discount stores now sell a lot of the cables that TVs need, like Wal Mart and KMart.

There really is no need for a Radio Shack anymore. Everything can be found elsewhere for cheaper. And if they don't soon Amazon will have it for next day shipping if not same day shipping.

Comment Re:RadioShack's business model (Score 3, Informative) 423

>But I don't think there's enough business there, sadly.

And there never was. But what would happen in the vast majority of cases is that people would walk in for that fuse or resistor and walk out with a bunch of other things as well, like batteries and RC toys. Which they became well known for around the holiday season.

However, with the great change in electronics that we have seen, they needed to continue to innovate, in the same way that they did with computers and the TRS-80 that was light years before anything else. They also had the first portable computers with LCD display. They needed to keep that same thinking alive.

Instead they put all their eggs in the same basket with cell phones, which was destined to become a commodity item.

If they really wanted to remain relevant, they would have moved into cell phone repair. That has now been taken up by countless niche kiosks in the same malls that Radio Shacks operate. They just could not see themselves doing that. They really dropped the ball on that one. And that is just one example of where they could have moved to.

If you want to see a store that is on the ball (and now another great place to buy batteries) is Harbor Freight.

Comment Re:RadioShack's business model (Score 1) 423

Actually that was considered by marketers at the time at Radio Shack's height as brilliance, as they would get your address and thus have a relevant mailing list of willing customers.

It is no different than all the "loyalty cards" that you now see everywhere (which make obtaining the address at every sale unnecessary - which really was annoying for both the customers and Radio Shack workers).

The 120-in-one kits was another stroke of brilliance for its time. And it too was one of my favorites along with the Atari. If you had those, you had everything!

But this is where they went wrong. They stopped that kind of innovation in favor of retail electronics and cell phones, in trying to capture short term gains. Both of these things are easier to get elsewhere. And the one demographic that went to their stores continually ceased needing to go there as hobby electronics was left in the dust, generally speaking. The areas that they needed to innovate in, they did not. It became all about cell phone sales.

I think it's too late for them now, There's too much management cruft around, and all the engineers are gone.

Comment Re:Radioshack's main problem... (Score 1) 423

Let's not forget that in the same time frame electronics has fundamentally changed to an enterprise that is largely disposable. The days of through hole electronics has pretty much ended and gone the way of vacuum tubes, in exchange for customized and unique semiconductors.

Radio Shack has lost their main demographic because they wanted to sell their soul to the cell phone business. Really a good example of looking for short term gains that come at the sacrifice of long term ones.

Comment Re:That's one heck of a very **BROAD** Patent ! (Score 5, Informative) 258

Haven't carried out a detail search on the said patent,

You won't be able to, either. The article states that due to age of the patent, the application is confidential.

Without seeing the application, it's difficult to tell what its validity is. But when this patent application was filed in 1971, electronic control of machinery was already quite widespread. So, it would have to be quite specific about its implementation. Then there is the question of making companies pay for something they knew nothing about.

In the end, congress would have the power to invalidate this patent outright, if they wanted to.

Comment Re:Troll (Score 1) 794

Their cautiousness can also be prescient. Note that you won't find yellow #5 artificial coloring there, something that science is only now starting to recognize as unhealthy. So while some of the things that they sell don't make sense to a skeptic, the fact that they recognize that we have to be careful with what we eat is right on target.

Comment Re:STEM workers are smart and needed elsewhere (Score 1) 491

My casual observation is that many STEM workers are far too amenable with building the robots, programming the computers, and engineering solutions to replace other people, or themselves, or help train the cheaper worker to replace themselves or another worker.

So we are also seeing an increasing supply of labor coming from increased efficiencies, which is in complete contradiction to somehow expecting long term growth for their own products?

And then is the failure of this administration (or any one for that matter) to take on age discrimination head on.

Comment Re:The difference in the two numbers ... (Score 1) 491

And it goes deeper. The so called smart "superstars" that someone might want to hire are smart enough to recognize how hollow of a promise STEM trades have become esp. programming might be and are moving to take up a trade instead. I see this everywhere. Because at least that is not going to be outsourced, or you won't lose your job because you turn 35.

I recommend that every would be programmer do this. You'll enjoy coding more for an open source project in your spare time. And then eventually companies will be forced to lie in the bed they are making for themselves, and it will not be comfortable. They can go ahead and move all their managers and the rest of their shebang overseas. We won't miss them.

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...