Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Chrome loads pages slower than FF (Score 1) 169

Mod parent up. Firefox is vastly preferable if you are trying to access the network behind a slow connection, like a GPRS cellphone for example. With Chrome you have to wait until everything is loaded before you are able to see the page, whereas Firefox does a decent job trying to render what it has loaded up to the present point.

Comment Re:Under what power? (Score 1) 203

In fact, that's incorrect in several aspects. First the EU- bureaucracy is not intended to be a government in the sense for the US, second the EU has enforced a large amount of rules onto its members. Just because you are not aware of it, it doesn't mean that it does not exist.

So what kind government are we going to have? A federation, a confederation, something more loose? I'm sorry but you avoid answering the original post's argument, that without a real constitution we won't be able to have a real European Union. And (IMHO) this is not going to happen soon because a large percentage of Europeans doesn't want it. When everything used to go fine it was grudgingly acceptable, but now that the real difficulty is at hand we fail miserably.

Comment Oh, another threat to freedom? (Score 2, Insightful) 354

In the best /. tradition, I won't even bother to RTFA.

Since the loss of Sun Microsystems, which in retrospect seems to have been one the most open companies ever and with open source contributions surpassing those of almost any other organization's in the world, I have grown extremely suspicious of people dictating to me that this or that is evil, all in the name of "freedom". All those guys that had been bashing Sun must be really happy now that Oracle has taken over.

I can think of several companies that by /. standards can easily rival the "evilness" of Apple, but almost magically they seldom get mentioned as threats to net freedom. Until I see everyone else get their fair share of bashing and flames, I'll assume articles (and comments) of this class as astroturfing.

Comment Re:Contradictions... (Score 1) 271

1 trillion bits /sec, 1Tbps? Not so fast. At this point, optic fibers can carry multiple wavelengths, each carrying up to 100Gbits/sec. Mind you, 100Gbits are pretty recent, with implementations coming up from the major companies, like alcatel-lucent (plz correct me if there's already a commercial product). A more sane number is 40Gbits, 10Gbits or even 2.5Gbits. To multiplex and demultiplex multiple lambdas in a fiber you need expensive optical de/multiplexers, an amount of pairs of transponders equal to the number of your lambdas and possibly amplifiers/regenerators. Although it should be easier if we are talking about fibers a few meters long, the electronics and the optical components to handle these rates are neither easy nor cheap.

It would sound more reasonable to expect to have a single connection maxing out at 10Gbps, preferably a 10Gbit ethernet connection.

Slashdot Top Deals

"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe

Working...